Rooney B L, Thompson J E, Schauberger C W, Pearse C A
Gundersen Clinic, Ltd., La Crosse, Wis., USA.
J Perinatol. 1996 May-Jun;16(3 Pt 1):215-9.
Our purpose was to examine the pregnancy and neonatal outcomes at a perinatal center with a consistent cesarean section rate approximately half the national average.
Ten years of vaginal delivery and cesarean section rates (1983 to 1992) and 5 years of mortality and morbidity outcomes (1988 to 1992) were compared with national health statistics and national health objectives.
The cesarean section rate during the 10-year period ranged from 10% to 15%, with an average of 12.5%. The cesarean section rate for the 5 years during which maternal and neonatal outcome data were obtained was 11.3%. The forceps and vacuum extraction rates during that time were consistently less than 5%. The nurse-midwifery service delivered approximately 36% of all babies during this period. In an examination of maternal mortality, we discovered only one death during the 5-year interval. The rate of maternal admission to the intensive care unit after delivery was 0.2%. The percent of women who received blood transfusions was 1%. The average length of stay for both vaginal and cesarean section deliveries declined steadily across the whole interval and was 2.5 days for a vaginal delivery and 5.5 days for a cesarean section. An examination of neonatal morbidity and mortality revealed an admission rate to the intensive care unit of less than 6%. The distribution of Apgar scores indicated less than 4% of neonates had scores < or = 3 at 1 minute; 0.5% had scores < or = 3 at 5 minutes. The neonatal death rate was 614 per 100,000 births, and fetal mortality was 729 per 100,000 births from 1988 to 1992.
The lowest safe cesarean section rate is not known; it will undoubtedly vary with location and patient mix. We believe that we have been able to establish a rate of cesarean section one half of the national average with good maternal and fetal outcomes. This has been accomplished through a vigorous prenatal care program, excellent perinatal and infertility services, a vigorous program of vaginal birth after cesarean section, and a competent nurse-midwifery service.
我们的目的是在一个剖宫产率持续约为全国平均水平一半的围产期中心,研究妊娠和新生儿结局。
将10年的阴道分娩率和剖宫产率(1983年至1992年)以及5年的死亡率和发病率结局(1988年至1992年)与国家卫生统计数据和国家卫生目标进行比较。
10年期间的剖宫产率在10%至15%之间,平均为12.5%。获取孕产妇和新生儿结局数据的5年期间的剖宫产率为11.3%。在此期间,产钳助产率和真空吸引助产率始终低于5%。在此期间,护士 - 助产士服务接生了约36%的婴儿。在对孕产妇死亡率的检查中,我们发现在5年期间仅有1例死亡。产后入住重症监护病房的产妇比例为0.2%。接受输血的女性比例为1%。在整个时间段内,阴道分娩和剖宫产的平均住院时间均稳步下降,阴道分娩为2.5天,剖宫产为5.5天。对新生儿发病率和死亡率的检查显示,入住重症监护病房的比例低于6%。阿氏评分分布表明,1分钟时阿氏评分≤3分的新生儿比例低于4%;5分钟时为0.5%。1988年至1992年,新生儿死亡率为每10万例出生614例,胎儿死亡率为每10万例出生729例。
最低安全剖宫产率尚不清楚;它无疑会因地点和患者构成的不同而有所变化。我们认为,我们已能够将剖宫产率维持在全国平均水平的一半,同时取得良好的母婴结局。这是通过积极的产前护理计划、优质完善的围产期和不孕不育服务、积极的剖宫产术后阴道分娩计划以及出色的护士 - 助产士服务实现的。