Yildiz O, Bolu E, Deniz G, Senöz S, Simşek A, Ozata M, Gündogan N, Gündogan M A
Department of Pharmacology, Gülhane School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey.
Pharmacol Res. 1996 Jan;33(1):41-6. doi: 10.1006/phrs.1996.0007.
A comparison was made of the effects of dexfenfluramine (DF, 3-10 mg kg-1) on intake of and conditioning with glucose solutions varying in orostimulant properties (taste) and post-ingestive actions (calories), in rats. First, sham-feeding, using gastric-fistulated rats, was performed to assess the orostimulant properties of the solutions. Then, two experiments were done. In the first experiment, we examined the effects of DF, given at doses of 13 and 10 mg kg-1, on the intake of two glucose solutions having different orostimulant properties and different caloric values. The solutions were a mix of 1% glucose plus 0.125% saccharin (low caloric, more orostimulant), and 4% glucose (high caloric, less orostimulant). At doses of 10 mg kg-1, DF administration markedly reduced intake of both solutions (P < 0.05 vs Control Group, respectively). In second experiment, we examined the effects of DF (10 mg kg-1) on flavour preference conditioning in two parts. In the first part of the experiment, rats consumed two distinctively flavoured solutions having equal orostimulant properties but different caloric value for a conditioning period of 16 days. The solutions were a mix of 1% glucose plus 0.125% saccharin (low caloric), and 6.1% glucose (high caloric). At the end of the conditioning period, the flavour paired with ingestion of more calories was subsequently preferred (P < 0.05 vs low caloric glucose-saccharin mix). DF, when given during and after the conditioning period, attenuated this flavour-calorie conditioning (P < 0.05 vs Control Group). In the second part of the experiment, rats were conditioned with flavours associated with a mix of 20% glucose plus 0.4% citric acid and 20% glucose solutions. These solutions were equally caloric but differed in orostimulant properties. The flavour paired with better orostimulant properties was subsequently preferred (P < 0.05 vs less orostimulant glucose-citric acid mix). DF, when given during and after the conditioning period, also attenuated this flavour-flavour conditioning (P < 0.05 vs Control Group). These results suggest that DF may impair flavour preference learning.
比较了右芬氟拉明(DF,3 - 10毫克/千克)对大鼠摄入不同口腔刺激特性(味道)和摄食后作用(热量)的葡萄糖溶液以及对其形成条件反射的影响。首先,使用胃瘘大鼠进行假饲,以评估溶液的口腔刺激特性。然后,进行了两个实验。在第一个实验中,我们研究了分别以13毫克/千克和10毫克/千克的剂量给予DF,对两种具有不同口腔刺激特性和不同热量值的葡萄糖溶液摄入量的影响。这两种溶液分别是1%葡萄糖加0.125%糖精的混合物(低热量,更强的口腔刺激)和4%葡萄糖(高热量,较弱的口腔刺激)。在10毫克/千克的剂量下,给予DF显著降低了两种溶液的摄入量(分别与对照组相比,P < 0.05)。在第二个实验中,我们分两部分研究了DF(10毫克/千克)对味觉偏好条件反射的影响。在实验的第一部分,大鼠在16天的条件反射期内摄入两种具有相同口腔刺激特性但不同热量值的独特风味溶液。这两种溶液分别是1%葡萄糖加0.125%糖精的混合物(低热量)和6.1%葡萄糖(高热量)。在条件反射期结束时,与摄入更多热量相关的风味随后更受青睐(与低热量葡萄糖 - 糖精混合物相比,P < 0.05)。在条件反射期期间及之后给予DF会减弱这种风味 - 热量条件反射(与对照组相比,P < 0.05)。在实验的第二部分,大鼠对与20%葡萄糖加0.4%柠檬酸的混合物和20%葡萄糖溶液相关的风味进行条件反射。这些溶液热量相同但口腔刺激特性不同。与更好的口腔刺激特性相关的风味随后更受青睐(与口腔刺激较弱的葡萄糖 - 柠檬酸混合物相比,P < 0.05)。在条件反射期期间及之后给予DF也会减弱这种风味 - 风味条件反射(与对照组相比,P < 0.05)。这些结果表明,DF可能会损害味觉偏好学习。