Suppr超能文献

纤维肌痛的认知教育治疗:一项随机临床试验。I. 临床效果。

Cognitive-educational treatment of fibromyalgia: a randomized clinical trial. I. Clinical effects.

作者信息

Vlaeyen J W, Teeken-Gruben N J, Goossens M E, Rutten-van Mölken M P, Pelt R A, van Eek H, Heuts P H

机构信息

Institute for Rehabilitation Research, Hoensbroek, The Netherlands.

出版信息

J Rheumatol. 1996 Jul;23(7):1237-45.

PMID:8823699
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This randomized controlled clinical trial evaluates the effectiveness of outpatient group cognitive/educational treatment for patients with the fibromyalgia (FM) syndrome. We hypothesized that the combination of group education with cognitive treatment aimed at developing pain coping skills would be more effective than group education alone.

METHODS

131 patients with FM were randomly assigned to 3 conditions: an experimental condition, which was the combined cognitive/educational intervention (ECO); an attention control condition consisting of group education plus group discussion (EDI); and a waiting list control (WLC). For the treatment conditions ECO and EDI, assessments were made 2 weeks before treatment, at start of treatment, at post-treatment, and at 6 and 12 mo followup. WLC patients received only 3 assessments.

RESULTS

There were no pretreatment differences between the groups, or between dropouts and patients who remained in the study. At post-treatment, and compared with the WLC, the ECO patients improved in knowledge about FM (p = 0.007) and pain coping (p < 0.001). EDI patients improved on pain coping (p = 0.005) and pain control (p = 0.002). EDI patients reported significantly less fear than ECO patients (p = 0.005). There were no other differential effects between ECO and EDI at post-treatment or 6 mo or 12 mo followup. Based on the reliability of change index for clinical significance, the relative short term success rates are 6.4 and 18.4% for ECO and EDI, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The surplus value of a highly structured, 12 session group cognitive treatment added to group education cannot be supported by our study. In EDI, fear reduction might have enhanced pain coping and pain control, while poor compliance, the difficulty of homework assignments, and lack of individual support may have limited the effectiveness of ECO.

摘要

目的

本随机对照临床试验评估门诊小组认知/教育治疗对纤维肌痛(FM)综合征患者的有效性。我们假设,旨在培养疼痛应对技能的小组教育与认知治疗相结合,将比单纯的小组教育更有效。

方法

131例FM患者被随机分配到3种情况:一种是实验情况,即认知/教育联合干预(ECO);一种是注意力控制情况,包括小组教育加小组讨论(EDI);还有一种是等待名单控制组(WLC)。对于治疗情况ECO和EDI,在治疗前2周、治疗开始时、治疗后以及6个月和12个月随访时进行评估。WLC组患者仅接受3次评估。

结果

各小组之间,以及退出研究的患者与留在研究中的患者之间,治疗前均无差异。治疗后,与WLC组相比,ECO组患者在FM知识(p = 0.007)和疼痛应对(p < 0.001)方面有所改善。EDI组患者在疼痛应对(p = 0.005)和疼痛控制(p = 0.002)方面有所改善。EDI组患者报告的恐惧明显少于ECO组患者(p = 0.005)。在治疗后、6个月或12个月随访时,ECO和EDI之间没有其他差异效应。根据临床意义的变化指数可靠性,ECO和EDI的相对短期成功率分别为6.4%和18.4%。

结论

我们的研究无法支持将高度结构化的、为期12节的小组认知治疗添加到小组教育中的额外价值。在EDI组中,恐惧减轻可能增强了疼痛应对和疼痛控制,而依从性差、家庭作业难度大以及缺乏个人支持可能限制了ECO的有效性。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验