Choi A, Laurito C E, Cunningham F E
Department of Pharmacy Practice, College of Pharmacy, University of Illinois at Chicago 60612, USA.
Ann Pharmacother. 1996 Jul-Aug;30(7-8):831-9. doi: 10.1177/106002809603000722.
To discuss the pathogenesis, incidence, and clinical presentation of postdural puncture headaches (PDPHs) and to provide a comprehensive evaluation on the pharmacologic management of PDPH.
A MEDLINE search was used to identify pertinent literature published in English including review articles, case reports, letters, and abstracts. Information was also extracted from textbooks for background purposes.
All clinical studies, case reports, abstracts, and letters were included because of the limited amount of literature available on the pharmacologic therapy for PDPH. Related research articles and review articles were also used to provide background information on PDPH.
Methodology and results from clinical trials and abstracts were described and evaluated. Case reports and letters were summarized and critically reviewed for the feasibility of the different treatment modalities. Information on the pathophysiology, incidence and severity, and clinical presentation of PDPH was extracted from related research articles, review articles, and textbooks.
The epidural blood patch (EBP) is one of the most effective treatments for PDPH. Pharmacologic management of PDPH offers a less invasive treatment modality than the EBP. Numerous drug therapies have been presented in the literature, though few merit clinical application. Caffeine therapy, both oral and parenteral, is the most commonly used pharmacologic treatment modality. Theophylline and sumatriptan are potentially promising agents for the treatment of PDPH. Epidural administration of fluids and drugs is also effective in the treatment of PDPH. Epidural adrenocorticotropic hormone and epidural morphine also demonstrate some potential in the treatment of PDPH. Individual patient characteristics (i.e., HIV, sepsis) need to be considered when deciding on a treatment. More reports, especially clinical studies, are necessary before a definitive statement can be made regarding any one treatment. In the meantime, therapy will be guided by clinical judgement based on the literature reviewed in this article.
Intravenous and oral caffeine are effective and noninvasive treatments for PDPH. Epidural NaCl 0.9% or dextran are alternatives when the EBP is unsuccessful or contraindicated. Several methods of pharmacologic management have been cited in the literature, but all require further evaluation.
探讨硬膜穿刺后头痛(PDPH)的发病机制、发病率及临床表现,并对PDPH的药物治疗进行全面评估。
通过医学文献数据库(MEDLINE)检索英文发表的相关文献,包括综述文章、病例报告、信函及摘要。同时也从教科书中提取背景信息。
由于关于PDPH药物治疗的文献数量有限,纳入所有临床研究、病例报告、摘要及信函。相关研究文章和综述文章也用于提供PDPH的背景信息。
描述并评估临床试验和摘要的方法及结果。总结病例报告和信函,并对不同治疗方式的可行性进行严格审查。从相关研究文章、综述文章及教科书中提取有关PDPH病理生理学、发病率和严重程度以及临床表现的信息。
硬膜外血贴(EBP)是治疗PDPH最有效的方法之一。PDPH的药物治疗提供了一种比EBP侵入性更小的治疗方式。文献中提出了多种药物治疗方法,但很少有值得临床应用的。口服和胃肠外咖啡因疗法是最常用的药物治疗方式。茶碱和舒马曲坦是治疗PDPH潜在有前景的药物。硬膜外注射液体和药物治疗PDPH也有效。硬膜外促肾上腺皮质激素和硬膜外吗啡在治疗PDPH方面也显示出一定潜力。决定治疗方案时需要考虑个体患者特征(如HIV、败血症)。在对任何一种治疗方法做出明确结论之前,需要更多的报告,尤其是临床研究。同时,治疗将以基于本文综述文献的临床判断为指导。
静脉和口服咖啡因是治疗PDPH有效且无创的方法。当EBP不成功或禁忌时,0.9%氯化钠或右旋糖酐硬膜外注射是替代方法。文献中引用了几种药物治疗方法,但都需要进一步评估。