Suppr超能文献

管理式医疗下的医学伦理学

Medical ethics under managed care.

作者信息

Schwartz P

机构信息

University of Pennsylvania, Reading Hospital and Medical Center, USA.

出版信息

Int J Fertil Menopausal Stud. 1996 Mar-Apr;41(2):124-8.

PMID:8829689
Abstract

"Managed Care" is having a profound effect on medical ethics and the patient/physician relationship. Historically, the patient (the first party) contracted with a physician (the second party) to provide medical care. The physician had ethical and legal obligations to the patient. In the "new health care," an employer or the government (the fourth party) or infrequently, the patient (the first party) purchases health care from the HMO, PPO, or similar organization (the third party). The third party then contracts with the physician (the second party) to provide that care. The physician has agreed to two, at times competing and possibly immutably conflicting obligations--one to the patient and one to the third party. The ethical and legal problems that arise from conflict between "the bottom line" and "desired" (appropriate) health care will be difficult to solve. The incompatible duality of physician roles both as patient advocate and manager of limited resources will be further explored, with attention to the enormous pressure being applied to this conflict by society, the law, and the third party. Potential resolutions will be offered. Other ethical problems created by the health care system's conversion to managed care include: CONFIDENTIALITY--Information management is a fundamental underpinning of managed care. With patients switching health care programs frequently, and their enormous size and complexity, careful attention to confidentiality is necessary. INFORMED CONSENT--In addition to informed consent relative to the health care being offered, the patient has a right to know what alternatives might be offered independent of her insurance and payment plan. The patient also has a right to know the economic pressures and arrangements between the second and third parties that could influence the quantity and quality of her health care. QUALITY OF CARE--Managed care contends to be religiously attentive to quality of care. If this is so, the very definition of quality of care may be changing.

摘要

“管理式医疗”正在对医学伦理以及医患关系产生深远影响。从历史上看,患者(第一方)与医生(第二方)签约以获得医疗服务。医生对患者负有伦理和法律义务。在“新医疗保健模式”中,雇主或政府(第四方),或者偶尔患者(第一方)从健康维护组织(HMO)、优先提供者组织(PPO)或类似机构(第三方)购买医疗服务。然后第三方与医生(第二方)签约以提供该医疗服务。医生同意承担两项义务,这两项义务有时相互竞争,甚至可能不可避免地相互冲突——一项是对患者的义务,另一项是对第三方的义务。“底线”与“理想的”(恰当的)医疗保健之间的冲突所引发的伦理和法律问题将难以解决。医生作为患者权益倡导者和有限资源管理者这两种角色的不相容二元性将得到进一步探讨,同时会关注社会、法律和第三方对这种冲突施加的巨大压力。还将提出可能的解决方案。医疗保健系统向管理式医疗转变所引发的其他伦理问题包括:保密性——信息管理是管理式医疗的一项基本支撑。由于患者频繁更换医疗保健计划,且这些计划规模庞大、情况复杂,因此必须谨慎对待保密性问题。知情同意——除了关于所提供医疗保健的知情同意外,患者有权了解独立于其保险和支付计划之外可能提供的其他选择。患者还有权了解第二方和第三方之间可能影响其医疗保健数量和质量的经济压力及安排。医疗质量——管理式医疗声称会极其关注医疗质量。如果真是这样,那么医疗质量的定义可能正在发生变化。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验