Rodríguez J, Bárcena M, Alvarez J
Anesthesiology Department, Complexo Hospitalario Universitario de Santiago, Santiago University, Santiago de Compostela, Spain.
Anesth Analg. 1996 Oct;83(4):752-4. doi: 10.1097/00000539-199610000-00016.
The aim of this study was to investigate which of two methods of nerve stimulation, cold saline-induced paresthesia or use of a nerve stimulator, was more effective in increasing the successful brachial plexus block rate by the axillary approach. Twenty patients were randomly assigned to Group A (saline below 11 degrees C), and 20 patients to Group B (nerve stimulator). All blocks were performed by the same anesthesiologist using 40 mL of 1.5% mepivacaine and 4 mL of 8.4% sodium bicarbonate. Successful block was defined using Vester-Andersen et al.'s criteria. Cold saline-induced paresthesiae in the hand or forearm were obtained in 19 patients (95%) during one of four attempts allowed, and in 15 patients (75%) on the first attempt. A motor response was evoked by a nerve stimulator in 17 patients (85%). Two patients (10%) had a paresthesia in the hand without a motor response with the current at less than 1 mA. A successful block was achieved in 19 patients in each group.
本研究的目的是调查两种神经刺激方法,即冷盐水诱发感觉异常或使用神经刺激器,哪种方法在通过腋路提高臂丛神经阻滞成功率方面更有效。20例患者被随机分配至A组(低于11摄氏度的盐水),20例患者被分配至B组(神经刺激器)。所有阻滞均由同一位麻醉医生使用40毫升1.5%甲哌卡因和4毫升8.4%碳酸氢钠进行。成功阻滞根据韦斯特-安德森等人的标准定义。在允许的四次尝试中的一次尝试期间,19例患者(95%)在手或前臂出现冷盐水诱发的感觉异常,在第一次尝试时,15例患者(75%)出现该情况。神经刺激器在17例患者(85%)中诱发了运动反应。两名患者(10%)在电流小于1毫安时手部出现感觉异常但无运动反应。每组均有19例患者实现了成功阻滞。