Strand V
Division of Immunology, Stanford University School of Medicine, California, USA.
J Rheumatol Suppl. 1996 Mar;44:91-6.
The complexity of the immune system, exemplified by the pleiotropic effects of many cytokines and the redundancy of regulatory networks controlling immune responses, suggests that single therapeutic interventions will offer transient or less than clinically meaningful benefit. Theoretically, combination therapy using 2 or more biologic agents will modulate important symptomatic and objective manifestations of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Data from animal models suggest that use of biologic agents in combination can be synergistic and may alter the severity and course of disease. Although combinations of biologic agents have yet to be used in human disease, successful examples employing immunosuppressive agents exist: cyclosporin (CsA) with methotrexate in patients with persistent active RA, as well as azathioprine and/or mycophenolate mofitil with CsA in organ transplantation and acute graft rejection. There are many arguments against the use of combination biologic therapies including acute infusion related toxicities, infection, malignancy, autoimmune manifestations, and expense. While caution dictates that phase I-II clinical trials be performed in patients with longstanding, refractory disease, subsequent trials should be conducted in patients with earlier, more responsive disease. Successful combination biologic therapies must afford sufficient duration of benefit (at least 6, preferably 12 months), cost comparable to approved 2nd line agents, ease of treatment, and an acceptable safety profile.
免疫系统的复杂性,以许多细胞因子的多效性作用以及控制免疫反应的调节网络的冗余性为代表,这表明单一治疗干预措施只能带来短暂的或低于临床意义的益处。从理论上讲,使用两种或更多种生物制剂的联合治疗将调节类风湿性关节炎(RA)的重要症状和客观表现。来自动物模型的数据表明,联合使用生物制剂具有协同作用,可能会改变疾病的严重程度和病程。虽然生物制剂的联合应用尚未用于人类疾病治疗,但存在使用免疫抑制剂获得成功的例子:在持续性活动性RA患者中使用环孢素(CsA)与甲氨蝶呤联合,以及在器官移植和急性移植物排斥反应中使用硫唑嘌呤和/或霉酚酸酯与CsA联合。反对使用联合生物疗法的理由有很多,包括急性输液相关毒性、感染、恶性肿瘤、自身免疫表现和费用等。虽然谨慎起见,应在患有长期难治性疾病的患者中进行I-II期临床试验,但后续试验应在病情较轻、反应性较高的患者中进行。成功的联合生物疗法必须提供足够长的受益时间(至少6个月,最好12个月),成本与已批准的二线药物相当,易于治疗,并且具有可接受的安全性。