Carter B L, Tiffany S T
Department of Psychological Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907, USA.
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 1996 Feb;123(3):289-96. doi: 10.1007/BF02246583.
The present study examined the cross-tolerance profiles of associatively and nonassociatively morphine-tolerant rats with analgesia produced by morphine and fentanyl (mu-receptor agonists) and U50,488H (a kappa-receptor agonist). Subjects were given a series of eight morphine injections either paired or unpaired with a distinctive environment and then tested for tolerance using the tail-flick method. Evidence was found that nonassociative morphine tolerance, which was produced using a 6-h interdose interval (IDI), was receptor-specific, i.e. cross-tolerant with analgesia produced by mu-specific, but not kappa-specific drugs. Nonassociative tolerance was characterized by a shift to the right in dose response curves of 0.32 log units in morphine-tested animals and 0.28 log units in fentanyl-tested animals. Conversely, associative morphine tolerance, which was produced using a 96-h IDI, evidenced a lack of receptor specificity by showing cross-tolerance to the analgesic effects of U50,488H. Associative tolerance was characterized by shifts of 0.42 log units in morphine-tested animals, 0.34 log units in fentanyl-tested animals, and 0.39 log units in U50,488H-tested animals. These results were interpreted as suggesting the mechanisms responsible for associative tolerance differ from those producing nonassociative tolerance. This conclusion is problematic for theories of learned tolerance that assume a unitary set of mechanisms subserving associative and nonassociative tolerance.
本研究检测了联合性和非联合性吗啡耐受大鼠对吗啡、芬太尼(μ受体激动剂)和U50,488H(κ受体激动剂)产生的镇痛作用的交叉耐受情况。给实验对象进行一系列八次吗啡注射,注射过程中要么与一个独特环境配对,要么不配对,然后使用甩尾法检测耐受性。研究发现,采用6小时给药间隔(IDI)产生的非联合性吗啡耐受具有受体特异性,即对μ特异性药物产生的镇痛作用有交叉耐受性,但对κ特异性药物产生的镇痛作用没有交叉耐受性。非联合性耐受的特征是,在接受吗啡测试的动物中,剂量反应曲线右移0.32对数单位,在接受芬太尼测试的动物中右移0.28对数单位。相反,采用96小时IDI产生的联合性吗啡耐受对U50,488H的镇痛作用表现出交叉耐受性,表明缺乏受体特异性。联合性耐受的特征是,在接受吗啡测试的动物中右移0.42对数单位,在接受芬太尼测试的动物中右移0.34对数单位,在接受U50,488H测试的动物中右移0.39对数单位。这些结果被解释为表明产生联合性耐受的机制与产生非联合性耐受的机制不同。这一结论对于习得性耐受理论来说是个问题,因为这些理论假定存在一套单一的机制来支持联合性和非联合性耐受。