Suppr超能文献

颈内动脉分段:一种新的分类方法。

Segments of the internal carotid artery: a new classification.

作者信息

Bouthillier A, van Loveren H R, Keller J T

机构信息

Department of Neurosurgery, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, USA.

出版信息

Neurosurgery. 1996 Mar;38(3):425-32; discussion 432-3. doi: 10.1097/00006123-199603000-00001.

Abstract

This study proposes an anatomically based nomenclature for the internal carotid artery (ICA) that can be applied by all disciplines. In 1938, Fischer published a seminal paper describing five segments of the ICA that were designated C1 through C5. These segments were based on the angiographic course of the intracranial ICA rather than its arterial branches or anatomic compartments. Subsequent attempts to apply modern nomenclature to these numerical segments failed to recognize Fischer's original intent of describing patterns of arterial displacement by tumors and, therefore, resulted in a nomenclature that was anatomically inaccurate. Fischer's system was further limited, because segments were numbered opposite the direction of blood flow and the extracranial ICA was excluded. The authors propose a new classification, which includes the entire ICA, uses a numerical scale in the direction of blood flow, and describes the segments of the ICA according to a detailed understanding of the anatomy surrounding the ICA and the compartments through which it travels. Twenty cadaveric specimens with intravascular injection of silicone rubber were used for microscopic dissection and 20 dry skulls were inspected. Histological sections in critical areas were examined. The authors' classification has the following seven segments: C1, cervical; C2, petrous; C3, lacerum; C4 cavernous; C5, clinoid; C6, ophthalmic; and C7, communicating. This classification is practical, accounts for new anatomic information and clinical interests, and clarifies all segments of the ICA.

摘要

本研究提出了一种基于解剖学的颈内动脉(ICA)命名法,可供所有学科使用。1938年,菲舍尔发表了一篇开创性论文,描述了ICA的五个节段,分别命名为C1至C5。这些节段是基于颅内ICA的血管造影走行,而非其动脉分支或解剖腔隙。随后将现代命名法应用于这些数字节段的尝试,未能认识到菲舍尔最初描述肿瘤导致动脉移位模式的意图,因此产生了一种解剖学上不准确的命名法。菲舍尔的系统还有进一步的局限性,因为节段编号与血流方向相反,且颅外ICA被排除在外。作者提出了一种新的分类方法,该方法涵盖了整个ICA,采用沿血流方向的数字标度,并根据对ICA周围解剖结构及其穿行腔隙的详细了解来描述ICA的节段。使用20个经血管内注射硅橡胶的尸体标本进行显微解剖,并检查了20个干燥颅骨。对关键区域的组织学切片进行了检查。作者的分类方法有以下七个节段:C1,颈部;C2,岩部;C3,破裂孔部;C4,海绵窦部;C5,床突部;C6,眼动脉部;C7,交通部。这种分类方法实用,考虑到了新的解剖学信息和临床关注点,且明确了ICA的所有节段。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验