Britz G W, Haynor D R, Kuntz C, Goodkin R, Gitter A, Maravilla K, Kliot M
Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Washington, and Seattle Veterans Administration Medical Center, USA.
Neurosurgery. 1996 Mar;38(3):458-65; discussion 465. doi: 10.1097/00006123-199603000-00007.
The diagnosis of ulnar nerve entrapment at the elbow has relied primarily on clinical and electrodiagnostic findings. Recently, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has been used in the evaluation of peripheral nerve entrapment disorders to document signal and configuration changes in nerves. We performed a prospective study on a population of 31 elbows in 27 patients with ulnar nerve entrapment at the elbow. The study correlated MRI findings with clinical, electrodiagnostic, and operative findings. A control population consisting of 10 asymptomatic subjects also was studied by MRI. Electrodiagnostic evaluation confirmed ulnar neuropathy in 24 (77%) elbows of the 31, with localization to the elbow region in 21 (68%). MRI, using a short tau inversion recovery sequence, demonstrated increased signal of the ulnar nerve in 30 (97%) elbows of the 31 and enlargement of the ulnar nerve in 23 (74%). No MRI abnormalities were found in the control population. MRI signal increase of the ulnar nerve occurred an average of 27 mm proximal to the distal humerus and extended distally an average of 4 mm below the distal humerus. The mean total length of increased ulnar nerve signal was 34 mm. Ulnar nerve enlargement occurred an average of 19 mm proximal to the distal humerus and extended distally an average of 8 mm above the distal humerus. The mean total length of ulnar nerve enlargement was 12 mm. The 12 patients who underwent a surgical procedure for ulnar nerve entrapment were found to have ulnar nerve compression, with 9 (75%) having excellent and 3 (25%) having good postoperative results. In this study, MRI was both sensitive and specific in diagnosing ulnar nerve entrapment at the elbow as defined by clinical, electrodiagnostic, and operative findings.
肘部尺神经卡压的诊断主要依赖于临床和电诊断结果。近来,磁共振成像(MRI)已被用于评估周围神经卡压性疾病,以记录神经的信号和形态变化。我们对27例肘部尺神经卡压患者的31个肘部进行了一项前瞻性研究。该研究将MRI结果与临床、电诊断及手术结果进行了对比。还对由10名无症状受试者组成的对照组进行了MRI研究。电诊断评估证实31个肘部中有24个(77%)存在尺神经病变,其中21个(68%)病变定位于肘部区域。使用短反转恢复序列的MRI显示,31个肘部中有30个(97%)尺神经信号增强,23个(74%)尺神经增粗。对照组未发现MRI异常。尺神经信号增强平均出现在肱骨远端近端27毫米处,并向远端延伸至肱骨远端下方平均4毫米处。尺神经信号增强的平均总长度为34毫米。尺神经增粗平均出现在肱骨远端近端19毫米处,并向远端延伸至肱骨远端上方平均8毫米处。尺神经增粗的平均总长度为12毫米。接受肘部尺神经卡压手术的12例患者均发现存在尺神经受压,其中9例(75%)术后效果极佳,3例(25%)效果良好。在本研究中,按照临床、电诊断和手术结果所定义的标准,MRI在诊断肘部尺神经卡压方面既敏感又特异。