Suppr超能文献

美国国立癌症数据库关于美国癌症治疗机构中美国癌症联合委员会癌症分期完整性的报告。美国外科医师学会癌症委员会和美国癌症协会。

The National Cancer Data Base report on completeness of American Joint Committee on Cancer staging in United States cancer facilities. The American College of Surgeons Commission on Cancer and the American Cancer Society.

作者信息

Fleming I D, Phillips J L, Menck H R

机构信息

Department of Surgery, University of Tennessee Center for Health Sciences, Memphis, USA.

出版信息

Cancer. 1996 Oct 1;78(7):1498-504.

PMID:8839557
Abstract

BACKGROUND

American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging is increasingly accepted as a prognostic standard for cancer management. The Commission on Cancer requires approved cancer programs to use AJCC staging for all cancers. Previous studies document increasing use of AJCC staging by hospitals with cancer programs. This review examines programmatic and clinical factors affecting AJCC staging completeness.

METHODS

The data are registry records submitted to the National Cancer Data Base (NCDB) for cases diagnosed during 1993 or, for comparison, 1988.

RESULTS

The mean facility staging rate was 87% in 1993, up from 65% in 1988. Approximately 64% of facilities staged greater than 90% of their stageable cases; 3% staged less than 5%. Even facilities with "complete" staging implementation were unable to stage substantial portions of some sites. Accessibility of tumor and overall prognosis affected the choice between pathologic and clinical staging. Staging completeness and the mix of pathologic and clinical staging also differed by state of the reporting facility.

CONCLUSIONS

AJCC staging use is high among common tumors for which treatment is dependent upon stage of disease. However, if accurate staging is not expected to affect the treatment or outcome of the case or the overall outcome is poor, staging is less frequently recorded.

摘要

背景

美国癌症联合委员会(AJCC)分期越来越被视为癌症管理的预后标准。癌症委员会要求获批的癌症项目对所有癌症使用AJCC分期。此前的研究记录了有癌症项目的医院对AJCC分期的使用增加情况。本综述考察了影响AJCC分期完整性的项目和临床因素。

方法

数据为提交至国家癌症数据库(NCDB)的登记记录,涉及1993年诊断的病例,或用于比较的1988年诊断的病例。

结果

1993年机构分期的平均比例为87%,高于1988年的65%。约64%的机构对其可分期病例的分期比例超过90%;3%的机构分期比例低于5%。即使是实施了“完整”分期的机构,也无法对某些部位的大部分病例进行分期。肿瘤的可及性和总体预后影响病理分期与临床分期的选择。分期的完整性以及病理分期与临床分期的组合在报告机构所在州也存在差异。

结论

在治疗取决于疾病分期的常见肿瘤中,AJCC分期的使用率较高。然而,如果预计准确分期不会影响病例的治疗或结果,或者总体结果较差,则分期记录的频率较低。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验