• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

美国癌症委员会批准与未批准医院的比较:对使用国家癌症数据库的研究的影响

Comparison of commission on cancer-approved and -nonapproved hospitals in the United States: implications for studies that use the National Cancer Data Base.

作者信息

Bilimoria Karl Y, Bentrem David J, Stewart Andrew K, Winchester David P, Ko Clifford Y

机构信息

American College of Surgeons, Division of Research and Optimal Patient Care, 636 N St Clair St, Chicago, IL 60611, USA.

出版信息

J Clin Oncol. 2009 Sep 1;27(25):4177-81. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2008.21.7018. Epub 2009 Jul 27.

DOI:10.1200/JCO.2008.21.7018
PMID:19636004
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The Commission on Cancer (CoC) designates cancer programs on the basis of the ability to provide a wide range of oncologic services and specialists. All CoC-approved hospitals are required to report their cancer diagnoses to the National Cancer Data Base (NCDB), and the cancer diagnoses at these hospitals account for approximately 70% of all new cancers diagnosed in the United States annually. However, it is unknown how CoC-approved programs compare with non-CoC-approved hospitals.

METHODS

By using the American Hospital Association Annual Survey Database (2006), CoC-approved and non-CoC-approved hospitals were compared with respect to structural characteristics (ie, accreditations, geography, and oncologic services provided).

RESULTS

Of the 4,850 hospitals identified, 1,412 (29%) were CoC-approved hospitals, and 3,438 (71%) were not CoC-approved hospitals. The proportion of CoC-approved hospitals varied at the state level from 0% in Wyoming to 100% in Delaware. Compared with non-CoC-approved hospitals, CoC-approved programs were more frequently accredited by the Joint Commission, designated as a Comprehensive Cancer Center by the National Cancer Institute, and affiliated with a medical school or residency program (P < .001). CoC-approved hospitals were less likely to be critical access hospitals or located in rural areas (P < .001). CoC-approved hospitals had more total beds and performed more operations per year (P < .001). CoC-approved programs more frequently offered oncology-related services, including screening programs, chemotherapy and radiation therapy services, and hospice/palliative care (P < .001).

CONCLUSION

Compared with non-CoC-approved hospitals, CoC-approved hospitals were larger, were more frequently located in urban locations, and had more cancer-related services available to patients. Studies that use the NCDB should acknowledge this limitation when relevant.

摘要

背景

癌症委员会(CoC)根据提供广泛肿瘤服务和专家的能力来指定癌症项目。所有获得CoC批准的医院都必须向国家癌症数据库(NCDB)报告其癌症诊断情况,这些医院的癌症诊断约占美国每年新诊断癌症总数的70%。然而,尚不清楚获得CoC批准的项目与未获得CoC批准的医院相比情况如何。

方法

通过使用美国医院协会年度调查数据库(2006年),对获得CoC批准和未获得CoC批准的医院在结构特征(即认证、地理位置和提供的肿瘤服务)方面进行了比较。

结果

在确定的4850家医院中,1412家(29%)是获得CoC批准的医院,3438家(71%)是未获得CoC批准的医院。获得CoC批准的医院比例在州一级从怀俄明州的0%到特拉华州的100%不等。与未获得CoC批准的医院相比,获得CoC批准的项目更频繁地获得联合委员会的认证,被国家癌症研究所指定为综合癌症中心,并与医学院或住院医师项目相关联(P < .001)。获得CoC批准的医院不太可能是急救医院或位于农村地区(P < .001)。获得CoC批准的医院总床位数更多,每年进行的手术更多(P < .001)。获得CoC批准的项目更频繁地提供与肿瘤学相关的服务,包括筛查项目、化疗和放疗服务以及临终关怀/姑息治疗(P < .001)。

结论

与未获得CoC批准的医院相比,获得CoC批准的医院规模更大,更频繁地位于城市地区,并且为患者提供更多与癌症相关的服务。使用NCDB的研究在相关时应承认这一局限性。

相似文献

1
Comparison of commission on cancer-approved and -nonapproved hospitals in the United States: implications for studies that use the National Cancer Data Base.美国癌症委员会批准与未批准医院的比较:对使用国家癌症数据库的研究的影响
J Clin Oncol. 2009 Sep 1;27(25):4177-81. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2008.21.7018. Epub 2009 Jul 27.
2
Relationship between cancer center accreditation and performance on publicly reported quality measures.癌症中心认证与公开报告质量指标绩效之间的关系。
Ann Surg. 2014 Jun;259(6):1091-7. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000000542.
3
Regional diversity and breadth of the National Cancer Data Base.国家癌症数据库的区域多样性和广度
Cancer. 1998 Dec 15;83(12):2649-58.
4
The National Cancer Data Base and physician network.国家癌症数据库与医师网络。
Top Health Inf Manage. 1997 Feb;17(3):45-59.
5
Spatial analyses identify the geographic source of patients at a National Cancer Institute Comprehensive Cancer Center.空间分析确定了美国国家癌症研究所综合癌症中心患者的地理来源。
Clin Cancer Res. 2010 Feb 1;16(3):1065-72. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-09-1875. Epub 2010 Jan 26.
6
Alternative pay-for-performance scoring methods: implications for quality improvement and patient outcomes.替代性绩效薪酬评分方法:对质量改进和患者结局的影响。
Med Care. 2009 Oct;47(10):1062-8. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e3181a7e54c.
7
Characteristics of hospitals providing preventive services: does delivery system integration make a difference?提供预防服务的医院的特征:医疗服务体系整合是否会产生影响?
Clin Perform Qual Health Care. 1996 Jan-Mar;4(1):25-33.
8
The National Cancer Data Base report on completeness of American Joint Committee on Cancer staging in United States cancer facilities. The American College of Surgeons Commission on Cancer and the American Cancer Society.美国国立癌症数据库关于美国癌症治疗机构中美国癌症联合委员会癌症分期完整性的报告。美国外科医师学会癌症委员会和美国癌症协会。
Cancer. 1996 Oct 1;78(7):1498-504.
9
The National Cancer Data Base report on recent hospital cancer program progress toward complete American Joint Committee on Cancer/TNM staging.美国国家癌症数据库关于近期医院癌症项目在实现美国癌症联合委员会/肿瘤-淋巴结-转移(AJCC/TNM)完整分期方面进展的报告。
Cancer. 1997 Dec 15;80(12):2305-10.
10
Using the NCDB for cancer care improvement: an introduction to available quality assessment tools.利用国家癌症数据库改善癌症护理:可用质量评估工具介绍
J Surg Oncol. 2009 Jun 15;99(8):488-90. doi: 10.1002/jso.21173.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluating Variation in Lymph Node Sampling During Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy for Melanoma.评估黑色素瘤前哨淋巴结活检术中淋巴结取样的差异。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2025 Aug 16. doi: 10.1245/s10434-025-18063-5.
2
National Variation in Implementation of Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy for Clinically Node-Positive Patients Undergoing Neoadjuvant Therapy.接受新辅助治疗的临床淋巴结阳性患者前哨淋巴结活检实施情况的全国性差异。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2025 Apr 18. doi: 10.1245/s10434-025-17293-x.
3
Treatment Patterns, Trends, and Outcomes of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Use Among Patients With Early-Stage Invasive Triple-Negative Breast Cancer.
早期浸润性三阴性乳腺癌患者新辅助化疗的治疗模式、趋势及结局
JCO Oncol Pract. 2025 Mar 24:OP2400871. doi: 10.1200/OP-24-00871.
4
Geographic Access to Cancer Care and Treatment and Outcomes of Early-Stage Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.早期非小细胞肺癌的癌症护理与治疗的地理可及性及治疗结果
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Mar 3;8(3):e251061. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.1061.
5
Money Matters: The Effect of Income on Postsurgical Outcomes in Stage IA Non-small Cell Lung Cancer.金钱问题:收入对ⅠA期非小细胞肺癌术后结果的影响。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2025 Jun;32(6):3933-3945. doi: 10.1245/s10434-025-17107-0. Epub 2025 Mar 12.
6
Utilization of Radical Prostatectomy Versus Radiation Therapy for Gleason Grade Group 5 Prostate Cancer Before and After USPSTF Grade D Recommendation Against Prostate-Specific Antigen Screening in 2012.2012年美国预防服务工作组(USPSTF)对前列腺特异性抗原筛查给出D级建议前后, Gleason 5级前列腺癌根治性前列腺切除术与放射治疗的应用情况
Cancer Med. 2025 Feb;14(3):e70624. doi: 10.1002/cam4.70624.
7
American College of Surgeons Operative Standards and Breast Cancer Outcomes.美国外科医师学会手术标准与乳腺癌结局
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Nov 4;7(11):e2446345. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.46345.
8
Association of commission on cancer accreditation with receipt of guideline-concordant care and survival among patients with colon cancer.癌症委员会认证与结肠癌患者接受符合指南的治疗及生存情况的关联
World J Surg. 2025 Jan;49(1):34-45. doi: 10.1002/wjs.12391. Epub 2024 Nov 7.
9
Are there differences in overall survival among older breast cancer patients by race and ethnicity?老年乳腺癌患者的总生存率在种族和族裔之间是否存在差异?
Surgery. 2025 Mar;179:108896. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2024.06.085. Epub 2024 Oct 30.
10
Ewing Sarcoma in the Pediatric Population: Predictors of Survival Within the United States.儿童成骨肉瘤:美国的生存预测因素。
J Am Acad Orthop Surg Glob Res Rev. 2024 Oct 21;8(10). doi: 10.5435/JAAOSGlobal-D-24-00281. eCollection 2024 Oct 1.