Suppr超能文献

两性霉素B脂质体和脂质混悬液治疗小鼠念珠菌病的效果。

Effects of amphotericin B incorporated into liposomes and in lipid suspensions in the treatment of murine candidiasis.

作者信息

Kretschmar M, Nichterlein T, Hannak D, Hof H

机构信息

Institute of Medical Microbiology and Hygiene, Faculty of Clinical Medicine Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Germany.

出版信息

Arzneimittelforschung. 1996 Jul;46(7):711-5.

PMID:8842344
Abstract

The effects of similar amounts of amphotericin B (CAS 1397-89-3, AmB) in different preparations either as conventional amphotericin B (des-AmB), or liposomal AmB (lipos-AmB), or des-AmB dissolved in a lipid emulsion (lipid-AmB) on Candida albicans and other Candida species were compared in several in vitro and in vivo models. The minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) of des-AmB was equal to the MIC of lipid-AmB when determined after 24 h. In contrast, the MIC of lipos-AmB was 4-8 times the MIC of des-AmB. When tested at 4 times the MIC of the respective preparations suspension of lipid-AmB led to a reduced ability to kill the fungi whereas des-AmB reduced the inoculum by 99% within 6 h. Four times the MIC of lipos-AmB failed completely to kill the fungi in the same time, but was only fungistatic. At 24 h all preparations had killed the yeasts at concentrations 4 times the MIC. In contrast to the in vitro data, lipos-AmB was more active in the treatment of murine candidiasis than lipid-AmB and des-AmB. Lipos-AmB but not lipid-AmB or des-AmB was able to significantly reduce the amount of Candida albicans in the liver when given in the same dosage. Concomitantly, AmB measured by HPLC was highly concentrated in the livers of the mice treated with lipos-AmB. It is concluded that even when given in the same dosage as des-AmB and lipid-AmB, lipos-AmB is more effective in the treatment of murine candidiasis, although it is less effective in vitro. Lipid-AmB is no alternative to lipos-AmB in this model of systemic infection of mice with Candida albicans.

摘要

在多个体外和体内模型中,比较了不同制剂中相同剂量的两性霉素B(CAS 1397-89-3,AmB),包括传统两性霉素B(去氧两性霉素B,des-AmB)、脂质体两性霉素B(lipos-AmB)或溶解于脂质乳剂中的去氧两性霉素B(lipid-AmB)对白色念珠菌和其他念珠菌属的影响。24小时后测定时,去氧两性霉素B的最低抑菌浓度(MIC)与脂质两性霉素B的MIC相等。相比之下,脂质体两性霉素B的MIC是去氧两性霉素B的MIC的4至8倍。当以各自制剂MIC的4倍进行测试时,脂质两性霉素B悬浮液杀灭真菌的能力降低,而去氧两性霉素B在6小时内可将接种量减少99%。脂质体两性霉素B的MIC的4倍在相同时间内完全无法杀灭真菌,仅具有抑菌作用。在24小时时,所有制剂在MIC的4倍浓度下均能杀灭酵母。与体外数据相反,脂质体两性霉素B在治疗小鼠念珠菌病方面比脂质两性霉素B和去氧两性霉素B更具活性。给予相同剂量时,脂质体两性霉素B而非脂质两性霉素B或去氧两性霉素B能够显著减少肝脏中白色念珠菌的数量。同时,通过高效液相色谱法测定发现,脂质体两性霉素B治疗的小鼠肝脏中两性霉素B高度浓缩。结论是,即使与去氧两性霉素B和脂质两性霉素B给予相同剂量,脂质体两性霉素B在治疗小鼠念珠菌病方面更有效,尽管其在体外效果较差。在白色念珠菌系统性感染小鼠的模型中,脂质两性霉素B无法替代脂质体两性霉素B。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验