• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

达卡巴嗪与干扰素α联合达卡巴嗪治疗转移性恶性黑色素瘤患者的疗效对比

DTIC vs. IFN-alpha plus DTIC in the treatment of patients with metastatic malignant melanoma.

作者信息

Rudolf Z, Strojan P

机构信息

Institute of Oncology, Ljubljana, Slovenia.

出版信息

Neoplasma. 1996;43(2):93-7.

PMID:8843969
Abstract

In our study we evaluated and compared the therapeutic success in 70 patients with cutaneous metastatic malignant melanoma (MM) treated at the Institute of Oncology in Ljubljana during the period 1985-1994. Twenty-nine patients received DTIC in a single 800 mg/m2 i.v. dose (Group 1) and 41 patients were receiving i.m. applications of IFN-alpha in 2 MU daily doses from days 1 to 4, completing the treatment with a DTIC application on day 5, given at the same dosage as in Group 1 (Group 2). The applications were repeated in three-week intervals until progression, or-in the case of a complete response-for up to 6 months. The rate and median duration of treatment response were higher in the group of patients treated by IFN-alpha plus DTIC (17% vs. 27%; 2.7 vs. 6.1 months), though the difference was not statistically significant. The survival of responders was either significantly higher (Group 2: p = 0.0007) or borderline-significantly higher (Group 1; p = 0.078) than that of non-responders. These patients also had significantly longer median survival (Group 1: 13.7 vs. 5.1 months, p = 0.019; Group 2: 19.3 vs. 4.9 months, p = 0.0003). The patients treated with IFN-alpha plus DTIC survived significantly better than those treated with DTIC alone (p = 0.043). There were no differences in the median duration of survival between both groups (6.6 vs. 6.7 months), and neither in the median duration of survival of responders (13.7 vs. 19.3 months) or non-responders (5.1 vs. 4.9 months) from both groups. The toxicity of combined therapy was higher than that of chemotherapy alone, though it was still moderate and acceptable. In view of our results, the addition of IFN-alpha to DTIC has shown an advantage over DTIC along.

摘要

在我们的研究中,我们评估并比较了1985年至1994年期间在卢布尔雅那肿瘤研究所接受治疗的70例皮肤转移性恶性黑色素瘤(MM)患者的治疗效果。29例患者接受了单次800mg/m²静脉注射达卡巴嗪(DTIC)(第1组),41例患者从第1天至第4天每天接受200万单位肌肉注射α-干扰素(IFN-α),并在第5天以与第1组相同的剂量应用DTIC完成治疗(第2组)。治疗每三周重复一次,直至病情进展,或在完全缓解的情况下持续6个月。接受IFN-α加DTIC治疗的患者组的治疗缓解率和中位缓解持续时间更高(分别为17%对27%;2.7个月对6.1个月),尽管差异无统计学意义。缓解者的生存率显著高于(第2组:p = 0.0007)或临界显著高于(第1组;p = 0.078)未缓解者。这些患者的中位生存期也显著更长(第1组:13.7个月对5.1个月,p = 0.019;第2组:19.3个月对4.9个月,p = 0.0003)。接受IFN-α加DTIC治疗的患者比单独接受DTIC治疗的患者生存情况显著更好(p = 0.043)。两组的中位生存期无差异(6.6个月对6.7个月),两组缓解者(13.7个月对19.3个月)或未缓解者(5.1个月对4.9个月)的中位生存期也无差异。联合治疗的毒性高于单纯化疗,但仍属中度且可接受。鉴于我们的研究结果,在DTIC基础上加用IFN-α已显示出优于单纯DTIC的优势。

相似文献

1
DTIC vs. IFN-alpha plus DTIC in the treatment of patients with metastatic malignant melanoma.达卡巴嗪与干扰素α联合达卡巴嗪治疗转移性恶性黑色素瘤患者的疗效对比
Neoplasma. 1996;43(2):93-7.
2
Dacarbazine and interferon alpha with or without interleukin 2 in metastatic melanoma: a randomized phase III multicentre trial of the Dermatologic Cooperative Oncology Group (DeCOG).达卡巴嗪与α干扰素联合或不联合白细胞介素-2用于转移性黑色素瘤的治疗:皮肤肿瘤协作肿瘤学组(DeCOG)的一项随机III期多中心试验
Br J Cancer. 2001 Apr 20;84(8):1036-42. doi: 10.1054/bjoc.2001.1731.
3
Cisplatin, dacarbazine, and fotemustine plus interferon alpha in patients with advanced malignant melanoma. A multicenter phase II study of the Italian Cooperative Oncology Group.顺铂、达卡巴嗪、福莫司汀联合α干扰素治疗晚期恶性黑色素瘤患者。意大利肿瘤协作组的一项多中心II期研究。
Cancer. 2000 Dec 15;89(12):2630-6.
4
Fotemustine compared with dacarbazine in patients with disseminated malignant melanoma: a phase III study.福莫司汀与达卡巴嗪治疗播散性恶性黑色素瘤患者的比较:一项III期研究。
J Clin Oncol. 2004 Mar 15;22(6):1118-25. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2004.04.165.
5
[Long-term results of adjuvant chemotherapy after therapeutic lymph node dissection in patients with cutaneous malignant melanoma].皮肤恶性黑色素瘤患者治疗性淋巴结清扫术后辅助化疗的长期结果
Hautarzt. 2002 Aug;53(8):536-41. doi: 10.1007/s00105-002-0398-9.
6
[Combination of dacarbazine, cisplatin and interferon alpha in the treatment of metastatic melanoma].达卡巴嗪、顺铂和α干扰素联合治疗转移性黑色素瘤
Ann Dermatol Venereol. 1996;123(9):538-42.
7
A randomized phase III study comparing dacarbazine, BCNU, cisplatin and tamoxifen with dacarbazine and interferon in advanced melanoma.一项比较达卡巴嗪、卡莫司汀、顺铂和他莫昔芬与达卡巴嗪和干扰素治疗晚期黑色素瘤的随机III期研究。
Br J Cancer. 2000 Mar;82(6):1158-62. doi: 10.1054/bjoc.1999.1056.
8
DTIC therapy in metastatic malignant melanoma: a simplified dose schedule.达卡巴嗪治疗转移性恶性黑色素瘤:一种简化的剂量方案。
Cancer Treat Rep. 1980 Oct-Nov;64(10-11):1123-6.
9
Therapeutic implications of the kinetics of immunomodulation during single or combined treatment of melanoma patients with dacarbazine and interferon-alpha.达卡巴嗪与α干扰素联合或单独治疗黑色素瘤患者期间免疫调节动力学的治疗意义
Neoplasma. 2001;48(3):175-81.
10
Treatment of metastatic malignant melanoma with dacarbazine plus tamoxifen.达卡巴嗪联合他莫昔芬治疗转移性恶性黑色素瘤。
N Engl J Med. 1992 Aug 20;327(8):516-23. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199208203270803.

引用本文的文献

1
Carbon-ion radiotherapy combined with chemotherapy for head and neck mucosal melanoma: Prospective observational study.碳离子放疗联合化疗治疗头颈部黏膜黑色素瘤:前瞻性观察研究。
Cancer Med. 2019 Dec;8(17):7227-7235. doi: 10.1002/cam4.2614. Epub 2019 Oct 16.
2
Meta-Analysis of the Safety and Efficacy of Interferon Combined With Dacarbazine Versus Dacarbazine Alone in Cutaneous Malignant Melanoma.干扰素联合达卡巴嗪与单用达卡巴嗪治疗皮肤恶性黑色素瘤的安全性和有效性的Meta分析
Medicine (Baltimore). 2016 Apr;95(16):e3406. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000003406.