Grewal H, Rao P M, Mukerji S, Ivatury R R
Department of Surgery, Lincoln Medical and Mental Health Center, Bronx, NY 10451, USA.
Head Neck. 1995 Nov-Dec;17(6):494-502. doi: 10.1002/hed.2880170607.
Penetrating laryngotracheal injuries are uncommon; however, these injuries are associated with significant morbidity and mortality. In an attempt to define the management of penetrating laryngotracheal injuries, we reviewed our experience with these injuries.
We retrospectively analyzed the records of all patients admitted to a Level I trauma center who required operative management for penetrating laryngotracheal injuries. During the period of this study all patients with penetrating neck injuries were managed according to a protocol of selective exploration.
Of fifty-seven patients with penetrating laryngotracheal injury 32 patients sustained gunshot wounds and 25 had stab wounds. The injuries were to the larynx in 24 (42%) and trachea in 33 (58%). Forty-six (81%) had isolated airway injuries and 11 (19%) had combined airway and digestive-tract injuries. Emergent airway management in 32 (56%) patients included: tracheostomy (15), endotracheal intubation (14), and cricothyroidotomy (3). Respiratory distress and subcutaneous crepitus were the commonest clinical findings. Diagnostic evaluation included: laryngoscopy/ tracheoscopy (17), esophagoscopy (12), contrast esophagography (9), angiography (8), and bronchoscopy (3). Repair of laryngotracheal and esophageal injury was performed in the majority of patients. Selected patients with milder laryngotracheal injury did not have tracheostomy performed, with no increase in morbidity or mortality. There were 2 (3.5%) early deaths from associated major vascular injury.
Mortality can be minimized by aggressive airway control. Endotracheal intubation can be accomplished safely in selected patients with penetrating laryngotracheal injuries. Digestive-tract injuries can often clinically occult and contribute significantly to morbidity and mortality; therefore, early evaluation of the esophagus is vital. Simple repair of laryngotracheal and digestive-tract injuries can be performed safely with good results. In patients with minor injuries, tracheostomy does not appear to be mandatory.
穿透性喉气管损伤并不常见;然而,这些损伤与显著的发病率和死亡率相关。为了明确穿透性喉气管损伤的治疗方法,我们回顾了我们在这些损伤方面的经验。
我们回顾性分析了所有入住一级创伤中心且因穿透性喉气管损伤需要手术治疗的患者的记录。在本研究期间,所有穿透性颈部损伤患者均按照选择性探查方案进行处理。
57例穿透性喉气管损伤患者中,32例为枪伤,25例为刺伤。损伤部位在喉部的有24例(42%),在气管的有33例(58%)。46例(81%)为单纯气道损伤,11例(19%)为气道和消化道联合损伤。32例(56%)患者的紧急气道处理包括:气管切开术(15例)、气管内插管(14例)和环甲膜切开术(3例)。呼吸窘迫和皮下气肿是最常见的临床表现。诊断评估包括:喉镜/气管镜检查(17例)、食管镜检查(12例)、食管造影(9例)、血管造影(8例)和支气管镜检查(3例)。大多数患者进行了喉气管和食管损伤的修复。部分喉气管损伤较轻的患者未行气管切开术,发病率和死亡率未增加。有2例(3.5%)因相关的主要血管损伤早期死亡。
积极的气道控制可将死亡率降至最低。对于部分穿透性喉气管损伤患者,气管内插管可安全完成。消化道损伤在临床上常不明显,但对发病率和死亡率有显著影响;因此,早期评估食管至关重要。喉气管和消化道损伤的简单修复可安全进行,效果良好。对于轻伤患者,气管切开术似乎并非必需。