Nagasaka Y, Fujita E, Hazu R, Nishimura N, Nakajima S
Fourth Department of Internal Medicine, Kinki University School of Medicine.
Arerugi. 1996 Jan;45(1):34-40.
In this study, we tried to clarify the characteristics of peak expiratory flow (PEF) measurement maneuver as a tool of daily monitoring severity of asthma in accordance with peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR) of forced expiratory maneuver. PEF did not differ when measured either in the standing or sitting position. However, obese individuals may have higher PEF when measured in the standing position and subjects with emphysematous change may have higher PEF when measured in the sitting than in the standing position. PEF did not differ when measured either with or without nose clip. Expiration time and volume in PEF measurement requires only one fifth and a half of that of forced expiratory flow volume measurement, respectively. In 36% of asthmatic patients in whom PEF is measured daily, PEF measurements were thought to be measured after inspiring at about 90% of forced vital capacity. Although PEF is a well tolerated useful clinical parameter in the management of bronchial asthma, it has different characteristics from peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR) of forced expiratory volume measurement.
在本研究中,我们试图根据用力呼气动作的呼气峰值流速(PEFR)来阐明呼气峰值流速(PEF)测量动作作为日常监测哮喘严重程度工具的特点。站立位或坐位测量时,PEF无差异。然而,肥胖个体站立位测量时PEF可能较高,有肺气肿改变的受试者坐位测量时PEF可能高于站立位测量时。使用或不使用鼻夹测量时,PEF无差异。PEF测量中的呼气时间和呼气量分别仅需要用力呼气流量容积测量的五分之一和一半。在每日测量PEF的哮喘患者中,36%的患者被认为是在吸入约90%的用力肺活量后进行PEF测量的。尽管PEF在支气管哮喘管理中是一个耐受性良好的有用临床参数,但它与用力呼气量测量的呼气峰值流速(PEFR)具有不同的特点。