Department of Pharmacy Practice, Auburn University Harrison School of Pharmacy, Mobile, AL 36688, USA.
J Am Board Fam Med. 2010 Mar-Apr;23(2):166-70. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2010.02.090120.
Current guidelines for the diagnosis and management of asthma suggest that patients perform peak expiratory flow (PEF) measurements while standing; however, recent literature suggests this may not be necessary. The purpose of this study was to determine the impact of patient position on PEF measurements.
A randomized observational analysis of PEF measurements for 211 patients in sitting and standing positions was performed. The highest PEF measurement from tests performed with correct technique in both the sitting and standing position was compared.
Overall, PEF measurements did not significantly differ between the sitting and standing positions (506 +/- 2 L/min versus 508 +/- 2 L/min; P = .45). No differences were seen between mean PEF measurements in the sitting or standing positions for either women or men, nor were there significant differences between mean PEF values for the sitting and standing positions in participants who reported a history of asthma.
PEF measurements do not significantly differ based on sitting or standing measurements among healthy participants. Based on the results of this study it may not be necessary for the patient to stand while performing PEF measurements. Further study among patients with asthma is warranted.
目前的哮喘诊断和管理指南建议患者在站立时进行呼气峰流速(PEF)测量;然而,最近的文献表明这可能不是必需的。本研究的目的是确定患者体位对 PEF 测量的影响。
对 211 例患者进行了坐位和立位 PEF 测量的随机观察分析。比较了正确技术在坐位和立位时进行的测试中最高的 PEF 测量值。
总体而言,坐位和立位的 PEF 测量值无显著差异(506±2 L/min 与 508±2 L/min;P=.45)。无论是女性还是男性,坐位或立位的平均 PEF 测量值之间均无差异,且在报告有哮喘病史的参与者中,坐位和立位的平均 PEF 值之间也无显著差异。
在健康参与者中,PEF 测量值不因坐位或立位而有显著差异。基于本研究的结果,患者在进行 PEF 测量时可能无需站立。需要进一步研究哮喘患者。