Wood J P
Department of Emergency Medicine, Christ Hospital and Medical Center, Oak Lawn, IL 60453, USA.
Acad Emerg Med. 1996 Aug;3(8):794-800. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.1996.tb03517.x.
In 1986 the federal government enacted a statute, the Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act (COBRA), intended to address the perceived problem of patients being denied essential emergency medical care, or being transferred in an unstable condition, because of the patient's lack of an adequate payer source. Compliance with COBRA has been a concern among hospitals and emergency physicians (EPs). Indeed, by the end of 1993, the federal government investigated > 1,500 allegations of COBRA violations. Since COBRA was enacted to address the problem of "economically motivated" transfers of indigent patients, many EPs are unaware of the potential for COBRA violations inherent in the accommodations currently being sought by some managed care organizations. This paper reviews hospitals' and physicians' obligations to managed care patients under COBRA.
1986年,联邦政府颁布了一项法规,即《综合预算协调法案》(COBRA),旨在解决因患者缺乏足够的支付来源而被拒绝接受基本紧急医疗护理或在病情不稳定时被转移的问题。遵守COBRA一直是医院和急诊医生(EPs)所关注的问题。事实上,到1993年底,联邦政府对1500多起违反COBRA的指控进行了调查。由于COBRA的颁布是为了解决贫困患者“出于经济动机”被转移的问题,许多急诊医生并未意识到一些管理式医疗组织目前所寻求的安置方式中存在违反COBRA的潜在可能性。本文回顾了医院和医生在COBRA下对管理式医疗患者的义务。