• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

刺激不对称对线平分的影响。

Effects of stimulus asymmetry on line bisection.

作者信息

Chieffi S

机构信息

Dipartimento di Fisiologia Umana e Funzioni Biologiche Integrate Filippo Bottazzi, II Università di Napoli, Italy.

出版信息

Neurology. 1996 Oct;47(4):1004-8. doi: 10.1212/wnl.47.4.1004.

DOI:10.1212/wnl.47.4.1004
PMID:8857735
Abstract

There is an upward bias in bisecting radial and vertical lines under visual guidance. We investigated whether illusory visual factors might contribute to a previously reported representational upward bias in this task. In two experiments, subjects performed a line-bisection task along the three orthogonal axes (horizontal, radial, vertical). In Experiment 1, the stimuli consisted of a line terminated at each end by two equal- or different-sized bars. In Experiment 2, the stimuli were formed by a line terminated by two equal- or different-sized directional labels: SOPRA ("top") and SOTTO ("bottom"). The results showed a bisection bias towards the smaller bar (Experiment 1) and the smaller directional label (Experiment 2) on all three spatial axes, supporting the existence of an illusory visual effect. Contrary to a previous report, the data failed to show any representational (semantic) bias related to directional label meaning. These findings suggest that perceptual/attentional factors play a significant role in normal subjects' upward bias.

摘要

在视觉引导下平分径向线和垂直线时存在向上偏差。我们研究了虚幻的视觉因素是否可能导致先前报道的该任务中存在的代表性向上偏差。在两个实验中,受试者沿着三个正交轴(水平、径向、垂直)执行线平分任务。在实验1中,刺激物由一条线组成,线的两端由两个大小相等或不同的条终止。在实验2中,刺激物由一条线组成,线的两端由两个大小相等或不同的方向标签终止:SOPRA(“顶部”)和SOTTO(“底部”)。结果表明,在所有三个空间轴上,都存在朝着较小条(实验1)和较小方向标签(实验2)的平分偏差,这支持了虚幻视觉效应的存在。与先前的报道相反,数据未能显示出与方向标签含义相关的任何代表性(语义)偏差。这些发现表明,感知/注意力因素在正常受试者的向上偏差中起重要作用。

相似文献

1
Effects of stimulus asymmetry on line bisection.刺激不对称对线平分的影响。
Neurology. 1996 Oct;47(4):1004-8. doi: 10.1212/wnl.47.4.1004.
2
A normal bias toward a pictorially defined top in line bisection.
Can J Neurol Sci. 1996 May;23(2):110-3. doi: 10.1017/s0317167100038816.
3
Line bisection under an attentional gradient induced by simulated neglect in healthy subjects.健康受试者中模拟忽视引起的注意力梯度下的线二分。
Neuropsychologia. 2012 May;50(6):1190-201. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2011.11.010. Epub 2011 Nov 19.
4
A representational vertical bias.
Neurology. 1994 Apr;44(4):703-6. doi: 10.1212/wnl.44.4.703.
5
Representational bias does not affect bisection of lines with a pictorially or semantically defined top by patients with left hemispatial neglect.表征偏差不会影响患有左侧半空间忽视的患者对具有图形或语义定义顶部的线条进行二等分。
Brain Cogn. 2002 Nov;50(2):167-77. doi: 10.1016/s0278-2626(02)00501-8.
6
Line bisection performances of 650 normal children.650名正常儿童的直线二等分表现
Neuropsychologia. 2000;38(6):886-95. doi: 10.1016/s0028-3932(99)00130-x.
7
Attention biases the perceived midpoint of horizontal lines.注意偏向会影响对水平线段中点的感知。
Neuropsychologia. 2011 Jan;49(2):238-46. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2010.11.022. Epub 2010 Nov 24.
8
Contributions of object- and space-based mechanisms to line bisection errors.
Neuropsychologia. 2001;39(8):856-64. doi: 10.1016/s0028-3932(01)00010-0.
9
The influence of baseline directional differences in pseudoneglect on distractibility.假性忽视中基线方向差异对注意力分散的影响。
Cortex. 2016 Apr;77:69-83. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2016.01.013. Epub 2016 Feb 4.
10
The complex interaction of normal biases in line bisection.直线二等分中正常偏差的复杂相互作用。
Neurology. 1997 Sep;49(3):887-9. doi: 10.1212/wnl.49.3.887.

引用本文的文献

1
Hemispheric Asymmetries in Radial Line Bisection: Role of Retinotopic and Spatiotopic Factors.径向线二等分中的半球不对称性:视网膜拓扑和空间拓扑因素的作用。
Front Psychol. 2018 Nov 12;9:2200. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02200. eCollection 2018.
2
Visual illusion and line bisection: a bias hypothesis revisited.视觉错觉与线段平分:再探一种偏差假说
Exp Brain Res. 2016 Jun;234(6):1451-8. doi: 10.1007/s00221-015-4550-z. Epub 2016 Jan 19.
3
Age-related differences in distractor interference on line bisection.干扰物对线二等分任务干扰的年龄相关差异。
Exp Brain Res. 2014 Nov;232(11):3659-64. doi: 10.1007/s00221-014-4056-0. Epub 2014 Aug 6.
4
Flanker interference effects in a line bisection task.直线二等分任务中的侧翼干扰效应。
Exp Brain Res. 2014 Apr;232(4):1327-34. doi: 10.1007/s00221-014-3851-y. Epub 2014 Feb 5.
5
Effect of a visual distractor on line bisection.视觉干扰对直线二分的影响。
Exp Brain Res. 2012 Jun;219(4):489-98. doi: 10.1007/s00221-012-3106-8. Epub 2012 May 11.
6
Effects of spatiotopic factors on bisection of radial lines.空间位置因素对径向线二等分的影响。
Exp Brain Res. 2008 Jul;189(1):129-32. doi: 10.1007/s00221-008-1458-x. Epub 2008 Jun 20.
7
Visual search pattern during the line quadrisection task in normal subjects.正常受试者在直线二等分任务中的视觉搜索模式。
Exp Brain Res. 2004 Jun;156(4):487-94. doi: 10.1007/s00221-003-1796-7. Epub 2004 Feb 19.