Franke W D, Taylor K A
Department of Health and Human Performance, Iowa State University 50011, USA.
Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol. 1996;73(1-2):169-74. doi: 10.1007/BF00262827.
To determine if different exercise modes used to improve cardiovascular fitness result in differing cardiovascular responses to lower body negative pressure (LBNP) in exercise-trained women, seven chronically exercising female runners (RUN) and 11 swimmers (SWIM) of similar fitness levels maximal oxygen uptake, [VO(2max), mean (SEM) = 50 (2) and 45 (2) mlkg(-1)min(-1), respectively; P > 0.05] underwent serial exposures to LBNP at pressures of 0, -1.3, -2.7 and -5.3 kPa (referenced to ambient barometric pressure). Forearm vascular resistance (venous occlusion plethysmography) increased with LBNP but did not differ between groups at any level of LBNP. At 0 and - 1.3 kPa, the total peripheral resistance index (TPRI; impedance cardiography) was significantly (P <0.05) higher in RUN than SWIM [1.118(0.028) vs 0.787 (0.040) at 0 kPa and 1.245 (0.100) vs 0.840 (0.040) 2 kPal min(-1)m(-2) at -1.3kPa]. At an LBNP of -2.7kPa, stroke index (SI) was significantly higher in SWIM than RUN [57.8(4.6) vs 41.9 (4.0) mlbeat(-1)m(-2)] while TPRI remained greater in RUN than SWIM. At -5.3 kPa, SWIM exhibited a higher cardiac index [3.232 (0.209) vs 2.447 (0.189) lmin(-1)m(-2)] and SI [49.4 (4.4) vs 31.0 (4.5) ml beat(-1)m(-2)] but reduced heart rate [71(3) vs 83(5) beats . min(-1)] and TPRI [0.968 (0.043) vs 1.655 (0.128) kPa1min(-1) m(-2)]. Mean arterial pressure declined significantly at an LBNP of -5.3 kPa in both groups; pulse pressure was lower (P <0.05) in RUN than SWIM at LBNP values of -2.7 and -5.3 kPa. These data suggest that: (1) female runners experience a greater increase in systemic vasoconstriction even though female swimmers can better maintain their cardiac index at high levels of LBNP, and (2) training mode appears to affect the pulse pressure responses to LBNP in exercise-trained women.
为了确定用于改善心血管健康的不同运动模式是否会导致运动训练的女性对下体负压(LBNP)产生不同的心血管反应,选取了7名长期进行跑步锻炼的女性跑步者(RUN)和11名健身水平相似的游泳者(SWIM)[最大摄氧量,[VO(2max),平均值(标准误)分别为50(2)和45(2)ml·kg(-1)·min(-1);P>0.05],让她们在0、-1.3、-2.7和-5.3 kPa的压力下(相对于环境气压)进行一系列LBNP暴露试验。前臂血管阻力(静脉阻塞体积描记法)随LBNP增加,但在任何LBNP水平下两组之间均无差异。在0和-1.3 kPa时,跑步者的总外周阻力指数(TPRI;阻抗心动图)显著高于游泳者(P<0.05)[0 kPa时为1.118(0.028)对0.787(0.040),-1.3 kPa时为1.245(0.100)对0.840(0.040)2 kPa·l·min(-1)·m(-2)]。在-2.7 kPa的LBNP下,游泳者的每搏输出量指数(SI)显著高于跑步者[57.8(4.6)对41.9(4.0)ml·次(-1)·m(-2)],而跑步者的TPRI仍高于游泳者。在-5.3 kPa时,游泳者的心脏指数[3.232(0.209)对2.447(0.189)l·min(-1)·m(-2)]和SI[49.4(4.4)对31.0(4.5)ml·次(-1)·m(-2)]更高,但心率[71(3)对83(5)次·min(-1)]和TPRI[0.968(0.043)对1.655(0.128)kPa·l·min(-1)·m(-2)]更低。两组在-5.3 kPa的LBNP下平均动脉压均显著下降;在-2.7和-5.3 kPa的LBNP值下,跑步者的脉压低于游泳者(P<0.05)。这些数据表明:(1)尽管女性游泳者在高水平LBNP时能更好地维持心脏指数,但女性跑步者全身血管收缩的增加幅度更大;(2)训练模式似乎会影响运动训练女性对LBNP的脉压反应。