Ziessman H A, Atkins F B, Vemulakonda U S, Tall J, Harkness B, Fahey F H
Department of Radiology, Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, D.C. 20007, USA.
J Nucl Med. 1996 Oct;37(10):1639-43.
This study compared the different calculation methods of the solid gastric emptying lag phase and evaluated the effect of the temporal sampling interval on the calculated value using the modified power exponential (MPE) method.
Twenty normal control subjects and 42 patients had anterior and posterior image acquisition on a multihead gamma camera, one frame per minute x 90. ROIs were selected for the stomach, gastric antrum and small bowel. Time-activity curves (TACs) were generated for anterior, posterior and geometric mean data. The lag phase was calculated using various methods such as transition point, starting index, first appearance of bowel activity (FABA), MPE and antral peak filling time. To determine the importance of the temporal sampling rate on the calculation of the lag phase by the MPE, intervals between 1 and 20 min were analyzed.
The transition point, starting index and FABA correlated extremely high (r = > or = 0.92) in normal control subjects and patients. Normal lag phase values were mean 22-24 +/- 10 min for transition point, starting index and FABA compared with 47 +/- 18 min for the MPE method (p < 0.0001). The MPE correlated poorly with the other method (r = 0.74). Antral peak filling time correlated poorly (r = 0.47) with transition point, starting index and FABA, but somewhat better with the MPE (r = 0.70). Comparing 15-min versus 1-min sampling intervals using the MPE, 35% of subjects had values that differed by > or = 7.5 min and 10% had values differing by > or = 15 min.
The lag phase calculated by the MPE correlated poorly with other methods, and its accuracy was limited by the rate of the temporal sampling. The transition point, starting index and FABA all highly correlated with each other; the latter is a particularly reliable physiological indicator and is easily quantified using a small-bowel TAC.
本研究比较了固体胃排空延迟期的不同计算方法,并使用修正幂指数(MPE)法评估了时间采样间隔对计算值的影响。
20名正常对照受试者和42名患者在多头γ相机上进行前后位图像采集,每分钟采集一帧,共采集90帧。在胃、胃窦和小肠区域选择感兴趣区(ROI)。生成前后位和几何平均数据的时间-活性曲线(TAC)。使用多种方法计算延迟期,如转折点、起始指数、肠活动首次出现(FABA)、MPE和胃窦峰值充盈时间。为了确定时间采样率对MPE法计算延迟期的重要性,分析了1至20分钟的时间间隔。
在正常对照受试者和患者中,转折点、起始指数和FABA之间的相关性极高(r≥0.92)。正常延迟期值,转折点、起始指数和FABA的平均值为22 - 24±10分钟,而MPE法为47±18分钟(p<0.0001)。MPE与其他方法的相关性较差(r = 0.74)。胃窦峰值充盈时间与转折点、起始指数和FABA的相关性较差(r = 0.47),但与MPE的相关性稍好(r = 0.70)。使用MPE法比较15分钟与1分钟采样间隔时,35%的受试者的值相差≥7.5分钟,10%的受试者的值相差≥15分钟。
MPE法计算的延迟期与其他方法的相关性较差,其准确性受时间采样率的限制。转折点、起始指数和FABA之间高度相关;后者是一个特别可靠的生理指标,使用小肠TAC很容易进行量化。