Lynch K M, Sellers T S, Gossett K A
SmithKline Beecham Pharmaceuticals, King of Prussia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Eur J Clin Chem Clin Biochem. 1996 Jul;34(7):569-71.
Methods for quantitating urinary protein differ in their ranges of linearity, technical ease of performance, and applicability to automated analyzers. The Coomassie Brilliant Blue method is widely used but has limited linearity and its tendency to stain glassware has limited its application to automated analyzers. We evaluated a pyrogallol red-molybdate protein dye-binding method (Biotrol USA, Inc.) on a Hitachi 705 analyzer for the quantitation of urinary protein in rats. This method showed a wide range of linearity (up to 2.6 g/l) and good precision. Within-run CVs of 6.6% and 1.3% and between-day CVs of 10.9% and 1.1% were observed at mean protein concentrations of 0.16 g/l and 1.96 g/l, respectively. In addition, rat urine protein results from this method correlated well (r2 = 0.998, n = 40) with a Coomassie Brilliant Blue method (QuanTtest Blue, Quantimetrix Corporation). No significant or unexpected interferences were encountered with this method. We conclude that the automated pyrogallol red-molybdate method is an acceptable and practical alternative to the Coomassie Brilliant Blue method for the quantitation of urine protein in rats.
定量检测尿蛋白的方法在其线性范围、操作的技术简易程度以及对自动分析仪的适用性方面存在差异。考马斯亮蓝法应用广泛,但线性范围有限,且其对玻璃器皿的染色倾向限制了它在自动分析仪上的应用。我们在日立705分析仪上评估了一种邻苯三酚红 - 钼酸盐蛋白染料结合法(美国Biotrol公司)用于定量大鼠尿蛋白。该方法显示出较宽的线性范围(高达2.6 g/l)且精密度良好。在平均蛋白浓度分别为0.16 g/l和1.96 g/l时,批内变异系数分别为6.6%和1.3%,批间变异系数分别为10.9%和1.1%。此外,该方法测定的大鼠尿蛋白结果与考马斯亮蓝法(QuanTtest Blue,Quantimetrix公司)相关性良好(r2 = 0.998,n = 40)。该方法未遇到显著或意外的干扰。我们得出结论,对于定量大鼠尿蛋白,自动邻苯三酚红 - 钼酸盐法是考马斯亮蓝法一种可接受且实用的替代方法。