Suppr超能文献

粒细胞巨噬细胞集落刺激因子可加速自体骨髓或外周血祖细胞移植及淋巴瘤大剂量化疗后的造血恢复。

Granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor accelerates hematopoietic recovery after autologous bone marrow or peripheral blood progenitor cell transplantation and high-dose chemotherapy for lymphoma.

作者信息

Colombat P, Delain M, Desbois I, Domenech J, Binet C, Tabah I, Lamagnere J P, Linassier C

机构信息

Department of Hematology, CHU Bretonneau, Tours, France.

出版信息

Bone Marrow Transplant. 1996 Aug;18(2):293-9.

PMID:8864437
Abstract

The use of recombinant human granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (rhGM-CSF) as an adjunct to autologous bone marrow transplantation (ABMT) or peripheral blood progenitor cell (PBPC) transplantation was evaluated in 59 lymphoma patients. Patients were divided into three groups. In group I (n = 21) patients received rhGM-CSF (5 micrograms/kg daily) at the time of PBPC collection and during the recovery phase post-infusion. In group II (n = 12) patients received rhGM-CSF as an adjunct to ABMT. In group III (n = 26) they were grafted with bone marrow without rhGM-CSF. Administration of rhGM-CSF (groups I and II) significantly reduced the time to myeloid engraftment, the number of febrile days and the median duration of antibiotics administration and of hospital stay when compared with the group in which patients did not receive rhGM-CSF. The only difference between ABMT and PBPC, given with rhGM-CSF support, was observed in the duration of hospitalization (group I > group II, P < 0.05). These data show that rhGM-CSF is highly effective in reducing the duration of aplasia following BMT and PBPC transfusion, and there appears to be little difference in efficacy between these techniques, provided that patients also receive rhGM-CSF.

摘要

在59例淋巴瘤患者中评估了重组人粒细胞巨噬细胞集落刺激因子(rhGM-CSF)作为自体骨髓移植(ABMT)或外周血祖细胞(PBPC)移植辅助治疗的效果。患者被分为三组。第一组(n = 21)患者在采集PBPC时以及输注后恢复期接受rhGM-CSF(每日5微克/千克)。第二组(n = 12)患者接受rhGM-CSF作为ABMT的辅助治疗。第三组(n = 26)患者接受未添加rhGM-CSF的骨髓移植。与未接受rhGM-CSF的组相比,rhGM-CSF治疗组(第一组和第二组)显著缩短了髓系植入时间、发热天数、抗生素使用的中位持续时间以及住院时间。在rhGM-CSF支持下,ABMT和PBPC之间唯一的差异在于住院时间(第一组>第二组,P < 0.05)。这些数据表明,rhGM-CSF在缩短BMT和PBPC输注后再生障碍期的持续时间方面非常有效,并且如果患者同时接受rhGM-CSF,这些技术在疗效上似乎没有太大差异。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验