• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

阅读中的眼动控制:两种模型的比较

Eye movement control in reading: a comparison of two types of models.

作者信息

Rayner K, Sereno S C, Raney G E

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Massachusetts, Amherst 01003, USA.

出版信息

J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1996 Oct;22(5):1188-200. doi: 10.1037//0096-1523.22.5.1188.

DOI:10.1037//0096-1523.22.5.1188
PMID:8865619
Abstract

Two classes of models have been proposed to account for eye movement control during reading. Proponents of the 1st class of model claim that the decision of when to move the eyes (reflected in fixation duration) is primarily influenced by the status of on-line language processing such as lexical access. Supporters of the 2nd class of model, however, maintain that (a) lower level oculomotor factors such as fixation location govern the decision of when to move the eyes and (b) lexical variables exert only a weak influence. In this study, fixation duration on low-and high-frequency target words was examined as a function of fixation location and the number of fixations on a target word. The data are inconsistent with an oculomotor model.

摘要

已经提出了两类模型来解释阅读过程中的眼动控制。第一类模型的支持者声称,何时移动眼睛的决定(反映在注视持续时间上)主要受在线语言处理状态的影响,如词汇通达。然而,第二类模型的支持者认为:(a)较低层次的眼动因素,如注视位置,决定了何时移动眼睛;(b)词汇变量的影响很小。在本研究中,研究了低频和高频目标词的注视持续时间与注视位置以及目标词上的注视次数之间的函数关系。数据与眼动模型不一致。

相似文献

1
Eye movement control in reading: a comparison of two types of models.阅读中的眼动控制:两种模型的比较
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1996 Oct;22(5):1188-200. doi: 10.1037//0096-1523.22.5.1188.
2
The time course of word frequency and case alternation effects on fixation times in reading: evidence for lexical control of eye movements.阅读中词频和格交替效应对注视时间的时间进程:词汇控制眼球运动的证据。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2010 Dec;36(6):1677-83. doi: 10.1037/a0019959.
3
Eye movement control in reading: accounting for initial fixation locations and refixations within the E-Z Reader model.阅读中的眼动控制:在E-Z阅读器模型中对初始注视位置和再注视的考量
Vision Res. 1999 Oct;39(26):4403-11. doi: 10.1016/s0042-6989(99)00152-2.
4
Lexical processing and text integration of function and content words: evidence from priming and eye fixations.功能词和实词的词汇加工与文本整合:来自启动效应和眼动注视的证据。
Mem Cognit. 2000 Oct;28(7):1098-108. doi: 10.3758/bf03211811.
5
Lexical predictability exerts robust effects on fixation duration, but not on initial landing position during reading.词汇可预测性对注视持续时间有显著影响,但对阅读过程中的首次落点位置没有影响。
Exp Psychol. 2009;56(1):66-74. doi: 10.1027/1618-3169.56.1.66.
6
Do readers obtain preview benefit from word N + 2? A test of serial attention shift versus distributed lexical processing models of eye movement control in reading.读者能从单词N + 2中获得预览优势吗?一项关于阅读中眼动控制的序列注意力转移与分布式词汇加工模型的测试。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2007 Feb;33(1):230-45. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.33.1.230.
7
Reading long words embedded in sentences: informativeness of word halves affects eye movements.阅读嵌入句子中的长单词:单词各部分的信息量会影响眼球运动。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1989 Feb;15(1):142-52. doi: 10.1037//0096-1523.15.1.142.
8
How strongly do word reading times and lexical decision times correlate? Combining data from eye movement corpora and megastudies.单词阅读时间和词汇判断时间的相关性有多强?结合来自眼动语料库和大型研究的数据。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2013;66(3):563-80. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2012.658820. Epub 2012 Apr 24.
9
Eye movement control during reading: II. Frequency of refixating a word.阅读过程中的眼球运动控制:II. 再次注视一个单词的频率。
Percept Psychophys. 1989 Sep;46(3):245-53. doi: 10.3758/bf03208086.
10
Child readers' eye movements in reading Thai.儿童读者阅读泰语时的眼动情况。
Vision Res. 2016 Jun;123:8-19. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2015.07.009. Epub 2016 May 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Eye Movements of Persons with Aphasia During Connected-Text Reading.失语症患者在连贯文本阅读过程中的眼球运动
Aphasiology. 2024 Oct 17. doi: 10.1080/02687038.2024.2413620.
2
To boldly go where no text has gone before: The effects of boldface letters on eye movements in reading.大胆探索文本未曾涉足之地:黑体字对阅读中眼动的影响。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2025 May;87(4):1270-1286. doi: 10.3758/s13414-025-03067-w. Epub 2025 Apr 16.
3
A beginner's guide to eye tracking for psycholinguistic studies of reading.阅读心理语言学研究的眼动追踪初学者指南。
Behav Res Methods. 2025 Jan 22;57(2):68. doi: 10.3758/s13428-024-02572-4.
4
When function words carry content.当功能词承载内容时。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2024 Dec 26;78(10):17470218241307582. doi: 10.1177/17470218241307582.
5
Word length and frequency effects in natural Chinese reading: Evidence for character representations in lexical identification.汉语自然阅读中的词长与频率效应:词汇识别中汉字表征的证据
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2024 Oct 6;78(7):17470218241281798. doi: 10.1177/17470218241281798.
6
Hong Kong Corpus of Chinese Sentence and Passage Reading.香港中文句子与篇章阅读语料库。
Sci Data. 2023 Dec 14;10(1):899. doi: 10.1038/s41597-023-02813-9.
7
The role of visual crowding in eye movements during reading: Effects of text spacing.视觉拥挤在阅读过程中的眼球运动中的作用:文本间距的影响。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2023 Nov;85(8):2834-2858. doi: 10.3758/s13414-023-02787-1. Epub 2023 Oct 11.
8
A developmental study of eye movements in Hebrew word reading: the effects of word familiarity, word length, and reading proficiency.希伯来语单词阅读中眼动的发展性研究:单词熟悉度、单词长度和阅读熟练度的影响。
Front Psychol. 2023 Jul 7;14:1052755. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1052755. eCollection 2023.
9
Consistency of preferred retinal locus across tasks and participants trained with a simulated scotoma.在模拟暗点训练下,不同任务和参与者的最佳固视点的一致性。
Vision Res. 2023 Feb;203:108158. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2022.108158. Epub 2022 Dec 15.
10
Linguistic Skill and Stimulus-Driven Attention: A Case for Linguistic Relativity.语言技能与刺激驱动的注意力:语言相对论的一个例证
Front Psychol. 2022 May 20;13:875744. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.875744. eCollection 2022.