Nelson D A, Schroder A C
Department of Otolaryngology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis 55455, USA.
J Acoust Soc Am. 1996 Oct;100(4 Pt 1):2266-77. doi: 10.1121/1.417936.
The upward spread of masking was compared for 500-Hz quasifrequency-modulated (QFM) and sinusoidally amplitude-modulated (SAM) maskers. The modulation rate was 20 Hz. These maskers had identical magnitude spectra but different envelopes, which were relatively flat for the QFM masker and strongly fluctuating for the SAM masker. At signal frequencies more than an octave above the masker, masked thresholds for the SAM masker were lower than for the QFM masker, revealing "masking release" (QFM-SAM masked threshold differences) exceeding 30 dB in normal-hearing ears. In ears with high-frequency sensorineural hearing loss, but normal hearing in the region of the masker, masking release was markedly reduced or completely absent in regions of hearing loss. The data were evaluated with a model of masking based on the linearized response growth (LRG) of basilar membrane transfer functions associated with cochlear damage in animals. The LRG model predicted more gradual slopes of the growth of masking and reduced amount of masking in regions of hearing loss. The reduced masking release seen in regions of hearing loss could be largely accounted for by a more rapid growth of response to the probe tone in regions of hearing loss.
比较了500赫兹准频率调制(QFM)和正弦幅度调制(SAM)掩蔽器的掩蔽向上扩展情况。调制率为20赫兹。这些掩蔽器具有相同的幅度谱,但包络不同,QFM掩蔽器的包络相对平坦,而SAM掩蔽器的包络强烈波动。在信号频率比掩蔽器高一个倍频程以上时,SAM掩蔽器的掩蔽阈值低于QFM掩蔽器,在听力正常的耳朵中显示出超过30分贝的“掩蔽释放”(QFM - SAM掩蔽阈值差异)。在高频感音神经性听力损失但掩蔽器所在区域听力正常的耳朵中,在听力损失区域掩蔽释放明显减少或完全不存在。使用基于与动物耳蜗损伤相关的基底膜传递函数的线性化响应增长(LRG)的掩蔽模型对数据进行了评估。LRG模型预测掩蔽增长的斜率更平缓,且在听力损失区域掩蔽量减少。在听力损失区域观察到的掩蔽释放减少很大程度上可能是由于在听力损失区域对探测音的响应增长更快。