Suppr超能文献

急性心肌梗死溶栓治疗与直接经皮冠状动脉腔内血管成形术的比较:茨城县16个临床中心的前瞻性多中心试验(筑波大学心肌梗死TUGMI研究组)

[Comparison of thrombolytic therapy and direct percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction: prospective multicenter trial at 16 clinical centers in Ibaraki prefecture TUGMI. Tsukuba University Group for Myocardial Infarction].

作者信息

Noguchi Y, Yamaguchi I, Sugishita Y

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine, Tsukuba Medical Center Hospital.

出版信息

J Cardiol. 1996 Mar;27(3):111-20.

PMID:8865683
Abstract

The efficacies of direct percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) and thrombolysis for the treatment of acute myocardial infarction were investigated in 80 patients treated within 12 hours of the onset of myocardial infarction by either PTCA (39 patients) or thrombolytic therapy (41 patients) followed by conservative care. The therapeutic approach was selected according to the treatment strategy at each of the 16 participating centers before the admission of the patients. The two treatment groups were closely matched in clinical characteristics except for the history of hypertension which occurred more in the thrombolysis group (22/39 vs 12/41, p = 0.026). The mean time before starting reperfusion therapy from the onset of symptoms was shorter in the thrombolysis group (2.3 +/- 1.5 vs 5.3 +/- 5.7 hours, p = 0.0001). Chest pain resolved more quickly in the PTCA group. Serial changes in the mean numbers of abnormal Q waves and mean values of the sum of elevated ST-segments on the electrocardiograms were similar in both groups. Serial changes of wall motion abnormality index on echocardiograms were similar in both groups. Coronary angiography after 4 weeks showed the thrombolysis group had greater residual luminal stenosis in the infarct-related artery. Left ventriculography after 4 weeks showed the PTCA group had better mean ejection fraction (68.1 +/- 11.2% vs 58.7 +/- 14.2%, p = 0.0263). Death (3/39 vs 1/41) and cardiac events (6/39 vs 6/41) after 4 weeks were similar in both groups. There was no significant difference in death and cardiac events between these two groups. However, the PTCA group had less severe residual luminal stenosis in the infarct-related artery and better left ventricular function after 4 weeks than the thrombolysis group.

摘要

对80例在心肌梗死发病12小时内接受治疗的患者进行了研究,比较直接经皮腔内冠状动脉成形术(PTCA)和溶栓治疗急性心肌梗死的疗效。其中39例患者接受PTCA治疗,41例患者接受溶栓治疗,随后进行保守治疗。治疗方法是在患者入院前,根据16个参与中心各自的治疗策略来选择的。除高血压病史外,两个治疗组的临床特征密切匹配,高血压病史在溶栓组中更为常见(22/39 vs 12/41,p = 0.026)。溶栓组从症状发作到开始再灌注治疗的平均时间较短(2.3±1.5 vs 5.3±5.7小时,p = 0.0001)。PTCA组胸痛缓解更快。两组心电图上异常Q波平均数和ST段抬高总和平均值的系列变化相似。两组超声心动图上室壁运动异常指数的系列变化相似。4周后的冠状动脉造影显示,溶栓组梗死相关动脉的残余管腔狭窄更严重。4周后的左心室造影显示,PTCA组的平均射血分数更好(68.1±11.2% vs 58.7±14.2%,p = 0.0263)。两组4周后的死亡(3/39 vs 1/41)和心脏事件(6/39 vs 6/41)相似。两组之间的死亡和心脏事件无显著差异。然而,PTCA组在4周后梗死相关动脉的残余管腔狭窄较轻,左心室功能比溶栓组更好。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验