Noguchi Y, Yamaguchi I, Sugishita Y
Department of Internal Medicine, Tsukuba Medical Center Hospital.
J Cardiol. 1996 Mar;27(3):111-20.
The efficacies of direct percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) and thrombolysis for the treatment of acute myocardial infarction were investigated in 80 patients treated within 12 hours of the onset of myocardial infarction by either PTCA (39 patients) or thrombolytic therapy (41 patients) followed by conservative care. The therapeutic approach was selected according to the treatment strategy at each of the 16 participating centers before the admission of the patients. The two treatment groups were closely matched in clinical characteristics except for the history of hypertension which occurred more in the thrombolysis group (22/39 vs 12/41, p = 0.026). The mean time before starting reperfusion therapy from the onset of symptoms was shorter in the thrombolysis group (2.3 +/- 1.5 vs 5.3 +/- 5.7 hours, p = 0.0001). Chest pain resolved more quickly in the PTCA group. Serial changes in the mean numbers of abnormal Q waves and mean values of the sum of elevated ST-segments on the electrocardiograms were similar in both groups. Serial changes of wall motion abnormality index on echocardiograms were similar in both groups. Coronary angiography after 4 weeks showed the thrombolysis group had greater residual luminal stenosis in the infarct-related artery. Left ventriculography after 4 weeks showed the PTCA group had better mean ejection fraction (68.1 +/- 11.2% vs 58.7 +/- 14.2%, p = 0.0263). Death (3/39 vs 1/41) and cardiac events (6/39 vs 6/41) after 4 weeks were similar in both groups. There was no significant difference in death and cardiac events between these two groups. However, the PTCA group had less severe residual luminal stenosis in the infarct-related artery and better left ventricular function after 4 weeks than the thrombolysis group.
对80例在心肌梗死发病12小时内接受治疗的患者进行了研究,比较直接经皮腔内冠状动脉成形术(PTCA)和溶栓治疗急性心肌梗死的疗效。其中39例患者接受PTCA治疗,41例患者接受溶栓治疗,随后进行保守治疗。治疗方法是在患者入院前,根据16个参与中心各自的治疗策略来选择的。除高血压病史外,两个治疗组的临床特征密切匹配,高血压病史在溶栓组中更为常见(22/39 vs 12/41,p = 0.026)。溶栓组从症状发作到开始再灌注治疗的平均时间较短(2.3±1.5 vs 5.3±5.7小时,p = 0.0001)。PTCA组胸痛缓解更快。两组心电图上异常Q波平均数和ST段抬高总和平均值的系列变化相似。两组超声心动图上室壁运动异常指数的系列变化相似。4周后的冠状动脉造影显示,溶栓组梗死相关动脉的残余管腔狭窄更严重。4周后的左心室造影显示,PTCA组的平均射血分数更好(68.1±11.2% vs 58.7±14.2%,p = 0.0263)。两组4周后的死亡(3/39 vs 1/41)和心脏事件(6/39 vs 6/41)相似。两组之间的死亡和心脏事件无显著差异。然而,PTCA组在4周后梗死相关动脉的残余管腔狭窄较轻,左心室功能比溶栓组更好。