Suppr超能文献

健康受试者中雾化吗啡与口服吗啡的全身吸收比较。

Systemic absorption of nebulized morphine compared with oral morphine in healthy subjects.

作者信息

Masood A R, Thomas S H

机构信息

Department of Physiological Sciences, University of Newcastle, Newcastle-upon-Tyne, UK.

出版信息

Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1996 Mar;41(3):250-2. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.1996.tb00192.x.

Abstract

The inhalation of nebulized morphine has been advocated to treat dyspnoea and pain in patients with cancer. We have compared plasma morphine concentrations in healthy volunteers after nebulized (50 mg in 4 ml saline), oral (10 mg solution) and intravenous (5 mg) morphine sulphate. Bioavailability was estimated by dividing the morphine concentration AUC/dose by that obtained after intravenous morphine. Peak plasma morphine concentrations were achieved more rapidly after nebulized than oral morphine, occurring within 10 min in all subjects. The systemic bioavailabilities of morphine (mean +/- s.d.) were 5 +/- 3% and 24 +/- 13% for the nebulized and oral routes respectively. Nebulization is a rapid but inefficient method of administering morphine. It may provide more rapid pain relief compared with oral morphine but clinical studies are needed to confirm this.

摘要

雾化吸入吗啡已被推荐用于治疗癌症患者的呼吸困难和疼痛。我们比较了健康志愿者在雾化吸入(4ml盐水中含50mg)、口服(10mg溶液)和静脉注射(5mg)硫酸吗啡后的血浆吗啡浓度。通过将吗啡浓度曲线下面积(AUC)/剂量除以静脉注射吗啡后获得的值来估算生物利用度。雾化吸入吗啡后比口服吗啡更快达到血浆吗啡峰值浓度,所有受试者均在10分钟内出现。雾化吸入和口服途径的吗啡全身生物利用度(均值±标准差)分别为5±3%和24±13%。雾化吸入是一种快速但低效的吗啡给药方法。与口服吗啡相比,它可能能更快缓解疼痛,但需要临床研究来证实这一点。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验