Houdi A A, Kottayil S, Crooks P A, Butterfield D A
College of Pharmacy, University of Kentucky, Lexington 40536, USA.
Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 1996 Mar;53(3):665-71. doi: 10.1016/0091-3057(95)02067-5.
In view of the potent analgesia exhibited by the apparent structurally dissimilar morphine-6-O-glucuronide (M6G) and morphine-6-O-sulfate (M6S) conjugates of morphine, we have examined the effect of structural modification of M6S on analgesic activity, using the tail-flick test. Changes in the M6S structure were made that would affect the lipophilicity and polarity of the molecule. Subcutaneous (sc) and intracerebroventricular (ICV) administration of equimolar doses of morphine, M6S, 3-O-acetylmorphine-6-O-sulfate (M3A6S), 3-O-benzoylmorphine-6-O-sulfate (M3B6S), and 3-O-acetyl-N-methylmorphinium-6-O-sulfate (MM3A6S) were employed. M6S and M3A6S exhibited a longer duration of action and greater activity compared to morphine after SC and ICV administration. However, M3B6S and MM3A6S in doses equimolar to that of morphine were found to be inactive after both SC and ICV administration. In addition, M3A6S showed the highest potency in inhibiting electrically stimulated guinea pig ileum followed by M6S and M3B6S. Moreover, both M6S and M3A6S displayed a greater affinity than that of morphine to mu and kappa 3 receptor sites in guinea pig brain homogenate. In contrast, the nonanalgesic compounds M3B6S and MM3A6S showed weak receptor binding ability compared to morphine. These results indicate that lipophilicity alone is not a determinant of analgesic activity in these novel morphine derivatives. These modified effects of morphine by the conjugations at the 3- and 6-position, appear to be due to their altered interactions with opioid receptors.
鉴于吗啡明显结构不同的吗啡 - 6 - O - 葡糖醛酸苷(M6G)和吗啡 - 6 - O - 硫酸酯(M6S)共轭物表现出强效镇痛作用,我们使用甩尾试验研究了M6S结构修饰对镇痛活性的影响。对M6S结构进行了改变,这些改变会影响分子的亲脂性和极性。采用皮下(sc)和脑室内(ICV)给予等摩尔剂量的吗啡、M6S、3 - O - 乙酰吗啡 - 6 - O - 硫酸酯(M3A6S)、3 - O - 苯甲酰吗啡 - 6 - O - 硫酸酯(M3B6S)和3 - O - 乙酰 - N - 甲基吗啡鎓 - 6 - O - 硫酸酯(MM3A6S)。与皮下和脑室内给药后的吗啡相比,M6S和M3A6S表现出更长的作用持续时间和更强的活性。然而,发现等摩尔剂量的M3B6S和MM3A6S在皮下和脑室内给药后均无活性。此外,M3A6S在抑制电刺激豚鼠回肠方面表现出最高的效力,其次是M6S和M3B6S。而且,M6S和M3A6S在豚鼠脑匀浆中对μ和κ3受体位点的亲和力均比吗啡高。相比之下,非镇痛化合物M3B6S和MM3A6S与吗啡相比显示出较弱的受体结合能力。这些结果表明,单独的亲脂性不是这些新型吗啡衍生物镇痛活性的决定因素。吗啡在3位和6位的共轭修饰作用,似乎是由于它们与阿片受体的相互作用改变所致。