de Leva P
Kinesiology Department, Indiana University, Bloomington, 47405, USA.
J Biomech. 1996 Sep;29(9):1223-30. doi: 10.1016/0021-9290(95)00178-6.
Zatsiorsky et al. (in Contemporary Problems in Biomechanics, pp. 272-291, CRC Press, Massachusetts, 1990a) obtained, by means of a gamma-ray scanning technique, the relative body segment masses, center of mass (CM) positions, and radii of gyration for samples of college-aged Caucasian males and females. Although these data are the only available and comprehensive set of inertial parameters regarding young adult Caucasians, they have been rarely utilized for biomechanical analyses of subjects belonging to the same or a similar population. The main reason is probably that Zatsiorsky et al. used bony landmarks as reference points for locating segment CMs and defining segment lengths. Some of these landmarks were markedly distant from the joint centers currently used by most researchers as reference points. The purpose of this study was to adjust the mean relative CM positions and radii of gyration reported by Zatsiorsky et al., in order to reference them to the joint centers or other commonly used landmarks, rather than the original landmarks. The adjustments were based on a number of carefully selected sources of anthropometric data.
扎齐奥尔斯基等人(载于《生物力学当代问题》,第272 - 291页,CRC出版社,马萨诸塞州,1990年a)借助伽马射线扫描技术,获取了大学年龄的白种男性和女性样本的相对身体节段质量、质心(CM)位置和回转半径。尽管这些数据是关于年轻成年白种人的唯一可得且全面的惯性参数集,但它们很少被用于对属于相同或相似人群的受试者进行生物力学分析。主要原因可能是扎齐奥尔斯基等人使用骨性标志作为定位节段质心和定义节段长度的参考点。其中一些标志与目前大多数研究人员用作参考点的关节中心明显不同。本研究的目的是调整扎齐奥尔斯基等人报告的平均相对质心位置和回转半径,以便将它们参考到关节中心或其他常用标志,而不是原始标志。这些调整基于一些精心挑选的人体测量数据源。