Suppr超能文献

镜筒式与唐纳森式导管:一项比较新型与传统通气导管的前瞻性研究结果

Lens tube vs Donaldson tube: results of a prospective study comparing a new with a conventional ventilation tube.

作者信息

Gordts F, Clement P A, Derde M P

机构信息

ENT Department, University Hospital, Brussels, Belgium.

出版信息

Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci. 1993 Oct;18(5):410-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2273.1993.tb00603.x.

Abstract

A prospective study was undertaken in 72 children comparing a new type of tympanostomy tube, the Lens tube, in one ear, and a Donaldson tube in the contra-lateral ear as a control. The average survival times of the tubes differed significantly: 17.20 months for the Lens tube, and 11.31 months for the Donaldson tube (P < 0.001). By contrast, the relapse rate (22% with the Lens tube vs 21% with the Donaldson tube) after extrusion or extraction, and the residual perforation rate (3% with the Lens tube vs 6% with the Donaldson tube) were not significantly different. Otorrhea was not significantly different either: 25% with the Lens tube vs 16% with the Donaldson tube.

摘要

对72名儿童进行了一项前瞻性研究,比较一种新型鼓膜造孔管(Lens管)在一只耳朵中的情况,以及对侧耳朵中作为对照的唐纳森管。两种管子的平均留存时间有显著差异:Lens管为17.20个月,唐纳森管为11.31个月(P < 0.001)。相比之下,脱出或取出后的复发率(Lens管为22%,唐纳森管为21%)和残余穿孔率(Lens管为3%,唐纳森管为6%)没有显著差异。耳漏情况也没有显著差异:Lens管为25%,唐纳森管为16%。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验