Ng C E, Bussey A M, Raaphorst G P
Ottawa Regional Cancer Centre, ON, Canada.
Int J Hyperthermia. 1996 Jul-Aug;12(4):551-67. doi: 10.3109/02656739609023531.
We investigated the modification of etoposide (i.e. VP-16)-induced cell killing by hyperthermia in a radioresistant human melanoma (Sk-Mel-3) and a human normal (AG1522) cell line. VP-16, a DNA topo II poison, was given as a 1 h exposure at variable doses up to 35 microM; hyperthermia was given either before or following VP-16 treatment. Hyperthermic treatment comprised one of the following: 41 degrees C for 8 h, 42 degrees C for 2 h or 45 degrees C for 15 min. Hyperthermia preceding VP-16 treatment reduced the cytotoxicity of the latter; the reduction of VP-16 cytotoxicity was directly proportional to the severity of the hyperthermic treatment. For a particular combination of hyperthermic dose and VP-16 concentration, generally similar responses were seen in both cell lines. There were no effects on VP-16 cytotoxicity when both Sk-Mel-3 and AG1522 cells were heated at 41 degrees C for 8 h following treatment with VP-16. However, heating both cell lines at 45 degrees C for 15 min following VP-16 treatment again reduced the amount of cytotoxicity associated with VP-16. In addition, we found that a preceding exposure to 45 degrees C, 15 min heating did not affect either cellular accumulation or efflux of [3H]VP-16 in both cell lines. This suggested that the reduction in VP-16 cytotoxicity observed under those conditions was not due to a modification of VP-16 transport. We found no differences between the catalytic activities of topo II extracted from nuclei of Sk-Mel-3 and AG1522 cells that were either heated at 45 degrees C for 15 min or that were not subjected to such treatment. These results therefore suggested that the substantial reduction of cytotoxicity seen when 45 degrees C, 15 min heating preceded VP-16 treatment was also not due to an effect on topo II catalytic activity. Our results therefore demonstrate that hyperthermia, given either before or after VP-16, can actually reduce the amount of VP-16 cytotoxicity and that this can occur without any overt changes in VP-16 accumulation and efflux or in topo II catalytic activity.
我们研究了在耐辐射的人黑色素瘤细胞系(Sk-Mel-3)和人正常细胞系(AG1522)中,热疗对依托泊苷(即VP-16)诱导的细胞杀伤作用的影响。VP-16是一种DNA拓扑异构酶II毒药,以高达35 microM的可变剂量暴露1小时;热疗在VP-16处理之前或之后进行。热疗处理包括以下之一:41℃持续8小时、42℃持续2小时或45℃持续15分钟。VP-16处理之前的热疗降低了后者的细胞毒性;VP-16细胞毒性的降低与热疗处理的强度直接相关。对于特定的热疗剂量和VP-16浓度组合,两个细胞系通常表现出相似的反应。在用VP-16处理后,将Sk-Mel-3和AG1522细胞都在41℃加热8小时,对VP-16细胞毒性没有影响。然而,在用VP-16处理后,将两个细胞系都在45℃加热15分钟,再次降低了与VP-16相关的细胞毒性量。此外,我们发现,在两个细胞系中,预先暴露于45℃、15分钟加热对[3H]VP-16的细胞内积累或流出均无影响。这表明在这些条件下观察到的VP-16细胞毒性降低不是由于VP-16转运的改变。我们发现,从Sk-Mel-3和AG1522细胞的细胞核中提取的拓扑异构酶II的催化活性,在45℃加热15分钟或未进行这种处理的细胞之间没有差异。因此,这些结果表明,在VP-16处理之前进行45℃、15分钟加热时观察到的细胞毒性大幅降低也不是由于对拓扑异构酶II催化活性的影响。我们的结果因此证明,在VP-16之前或之后进行热疗,实际上可以降低VP-16的细胞毒性量,并且这可以在VP-16的积累和流出或拓扑异构酶II催化活性没有任何明显变化的情况下发生。