• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

The effect of donor age on the processing of UV-damaged DNA by cultured human cells: reduced DNA repair capacity and increased DNA mutability.

作者信息

Moriwaki S, Ray S, Tarone R E, Kraemer K H, Grossman L

机构信息

Laboratory of Molecular Carcinogenesis, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA.

出版信息

Mutat Res. 1996 Oct 18;364(2):117-23. doi: 10.1016/0921-8777(96)00029-8.

DOI:10.1016/0921-8777(96)00029-8
PMID:8879277
Abstract

Aging in humans carries an increased risk of skin cancer, a disorder linked to somatic mutations in sun damaged skin. DNA repair plays a major role in protection against sun damage. We found an age-related decline in post-UV DNA repair capacity (measured by the ability to repair a UV-treated plasmid (pCMVcat)) of-0.6% per year (p = 0.0001) in cultured primary skin fibroblasts from normal donors from the first to the tenth decade of life. There was a corresponding age-related increase in post-UV mutability (measured as mutations introduced into a transfected, UV-treated plasmid (pSP189)) of +0.6% per year (p = 0.001) in lymphoblastoid cell lines from normal donors of the same age range. This study indicates that aging in humans is associated with decreasing ability to process new UV-induced DNA damage and this age-related reduction in DNA repair capacity and increase in DNA mutability is reflected in cultured skin and blood cells.

摘要

相似文献

1
The effect of donor age on the processing of UV-damaged DNA by cultured human cells: reduced DNA repair capacity and increased DNA mutability.
Mutat Res. 1996 Oct 18;364(2):117-23. doi: 10.1016/0921-8777(96)00029-8.
2
Expression of a transfected DNA repair gene (XPA) in xeroderma pigmentosum group A cells restores normal DNA repair and mutagenesis of UV-treated plasmids.转染的DNA修复基因(XPA)在A型着色性干皮病细胞中的表达可恢复紫外线处理质粒的正常DNA修复和诱变。
Carcinogenesis. 1995 Jul;16(7):1557-63. doi: 10.1093/carcin/16.7.1557.
3
Decreased gene expression responsible for post-ultraviolet DNA repair synthesis in aging: a possible mechanism of age-related reduction in DNA repair capacity.衰老过程中负责紫外线后DNA修复合成的基因表达降低:与年龄相关的DNA修复能力下降的一种可能机制。
J Invest Dermatol. 2005 Feb;124(2):435-42. doi: 10.1111/j.0022-202X.2004.23591.x.
4
DNA repair in human fibroblasts, as reflected by host-cell reactivation of a transfected UV-irradiated luciferase gene, is not related to donor age.通过转染的紫外线照射的荧光素酶基因的宿主细胞再激活所反映的人类成纤维细胞中的DNA修复与供体年龄无关。
Mutat Res. 2004 Oct 4;554(1-2):9-17. doi: 10.1016/j.mrfmmm.2004.02.013.
5
Mechanisms and implications of the age-associated decrease in DNA repair capacity.与年龄相关的DNA修复能力下降的机制及影响
FASEB J. 2000 Jul;14(10):1325-34. doi: 10.1096/fj.14.10.1325.
6
Hypermutability of UV-treated plasmids in dysplastic nevus/familial melanoma cell lines.发育异常痣/家族性黑色素瘤细胞系中紫外线处理质粒的高突变性
Cancer Res. 1997 Oct 15;57(20):4637-41.
7
DNA repair and ultraviolet mutagenesis in cells from a new patient with xeroderma pigmentosum group G and cockayne syndrome resemble xeroderma pigmentosum cells.一名患有G组着色性干皮病和科凯恩综合征的新患者的细胞中的DNA修复和紫外线诱变与着色性干皮病细胞相似。
J Invest Dermatol. 1996 Oct;107(4):647-53. doi: 10.1111/1523-1747.ep12584287.
8
Telomerase-immortalized human fibroblasts retain UV-induced mutagenesis and p53-mediated DNA damage responses.端粒酶永生化的人成纤维细胞保留紫外线诱导的诱变作用和p53介导的DNA损伤反应。
DNA Repair (Amst). 2006 Jan 5;5(1):61-70. doi: 10.1016/j.dnarep.2005.07.005. Epub 2005 Sep 1.
9
UV damage and DNA repair in malignant melanoma and nonmelanoma skin cancer.恶性黑色素瘤和非黑色素瘤皮肤癌中的紫外线损伤与DNA修复
Adv Exp Med Biol. 2008;624:162-78. doi: 10.1007/978-0-387-77574-6_13.
10
Role of solar conditioning in DNA repair response and survival of human epidermal keratinocytes following UV irradiation.日光预处理在紫外线照射后人表皮角质形成细胞DNA修复反应及存活中的作用。
J Invest Dermatol. 1985 Aug;85(2):93-7. doi: 10.1111/1523-1747.ep12276441.

引用本文的文献

1
Mechanisms of DNA Damage Response in Mammalian Oocytes.哺乳动物卵母细胞中 DNA 损伤反应的机制。
Adv Anat Embryol Cell Biol. 2024;238:47-68. doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-55163-5_3.
2
Human Variation in DNA Repair, Immune Function, and Cancer Risk.人类 DNA 修复、免疫功能和癌症风险的变异。
Front Immunol. 2022 Jul 22;13:899574. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.899574. eCollection 2022.
3
Focus on the Contribution of Oxidative Stress in Skin Aging.关注氧化应激在皮肤衰老中的作用。
Antioxidants (Basel). 2022 Jun 6;11(6):1121. doi: 10.3390/antiox11061121.
4
Incident Cancer Risk and Signatures Among Older MUTYH Carriers: Analysis of Population-Based and Genomic Cohorts.老年 MUTYH 携带者的偶发癌症风险和特征:基于人群和基因组队列的分析。
Cancer Prev Res (Phila). 2022 Aug 1;15(8):509-519. doi: 10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-22-0080.
5
The accelerated aging phenotype: The role of race and social determinants of health on aging.加速衰老表型:种族和健康社会决定因素对衰老的作用。
Ageing Res Rev. 2022 Jan;73:101536. doi: 10.1016/j.arr.2021.101536. Epub 2021 Dec 6.
6
Basal Cell Carcinoma of the External Genitalia: A Population-Based Analysis.外生殖器基底细胞癌:一项基于人群的分析。
Front Oncol. 2021 Jan 26;10:613533. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2020.613533. eCollection 2020.
7
Clonal Hematopoiesis, Cardiovascular Diseases and Hematopoietic Stem Cells.克隆性造血、心血管疾病与造血干细胞
Int J Mol Sci. 2020 Oct 24;21(21):7902. doi: 10.3390/ijms21217902.
8
Calcineurin inhibitor (CNI)-associated skin cancers: New insights on exploring mechanisms by which CNIs downregulate DNA repair machinery.钙调磷酸酶抑制剂(CNI)相关皮肤癌:探索 CNI 下调 DNA 修复机制的新见解。
Photodermatol Photoimmunol Photomed. 2020 Nov;36(6):433-440. doi: 10.1111/phpp.12600. Epub 2020 Aug 27.
9
Prospective randomized controlled pilot study on the effects of almond consumption on skin lipids and wrinkles.前瞻性随机对照初步研究杏仁摄入对皮肤脂质和皱纹的影响。
Phytother Res. 2019 Dec;33(12):3212-3217. doi: 10.1002/ptr.6495. Epub 2019 Oct 1.
10
Biomarkers of Cellular Senescence and Skin Aging.细胞衰老与皮肤老化的生物标志物
Front Genet. 2018 Aug 23;9:247. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2018.00247. eCollection 2018.