Levaggi R
Istituto di Finanza, Facoltà di Economia, Università di Genova, Italy.
Health Econ. 1996 Jul-Aug;5(4):341-52. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1050(199607)5:4<341::AID-HEC196>3.0.CO;2-7.
The White Paper Working for Patients has produced dramatic changes in the organization of health care in the UK that will soon be followed by analogous reforms in other countries. The core of the reform is represented by the separation of the responsibility for purchasing health care from providing the services. The creation of this internal market is said to enhance efficiency, but some peculiar characteristics of health care prevent a Pareto optimal solution being reached. This paper describes the purchaser-provider relationship using an innovative principal agent model to assess the relative merits of the different forms of contracts. The model is also used to show how competition among providers allows the purchaser to extract this private information. From a theoretical point of view, the approach is innovative in the formulation of the principal's objective function; the interesting finding is that the presence of a stringent budget constraint alters both risk-sharing conditions and the First-best contract proposed by the literature. From a policy point of view, the paper explains why in the first wave over 75% of contracts between purchasers and providers were block contracts. It is also demonstrated why this contractual form should be avoided.
《为患者服务白皮书》已使英国医疗保健机构发生了巨大变化,其他国家很快也会进行类似改革。改革的核心是将医疗保健购买责任与服务提供责任分离。据说这种内部市场的创建能提高效率,但医疗保健的一些特殊特征阻碍了帕累托最优解决方案的实现。本文使用一种创新的委托代理模型来描述购买者与提供者之间的关系,以评估不同形式合同的相对优点。该模型还用于展示提供者之间的竞争如何使购买者获取这些私人信息。从理论角度看,该方法在委托人目标函数的制定方面具有创新性;有趣的发现是,严格预算约束的存在改变了风险分担条件以及文献中提出的最优合同。从政策角度看,本文解释了为何在第一波改革中,购买者与提供者之间超过75%的合同是整体合同。还证明了为何应避免这种合同形式。