Lenard G
Department of Pediatrics, Heinrich-Heine University, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Brain Dev. 1995;17 Suppl:44-7.
In Europe, the recent advances in prenatal diagnosis and their practical consequences have elicited political rather than ethical discussions. An attempt will be made to outline and to ethically evaluate criteria pertaining to the termination of pregnancy because of malformation or disease of the fetus. Is it possible to determine the beginning of life, of an individual, of a personality? Are the severity of a malformation or disease, the duration of life to be expected, and the probable time of onset of relevant disease symptoms measurable parameters that can be used to arrive at an ethically correct or at least acceptable decision? In spite of efforts towards ethical objectivity, it appears difficult to set criteria completely independent of professional experience and responsibilities, and of legal liabilities sometimes resulting in dialectical patterns of thinking. The mothers' needs and wishes will play a paramount role in obstetric considerations. The paediatric point of view necessarily emphasizes the best interest of the child. Ethical criteria can not provide unequivocal answers. They can help, however, in a 'no-win' situation, to find an acceptable way between two 'evils': the death of an unborn child or the birth of a child with a severe disease.
在欧洲,产前诊断的最新进展及其实际影响引发了政治讨论而非伦理讨论。本文将尝试概述并从伦理角度评估与因胎儿畸形或疾病而终止妊娠相关的标准。是否有可能确定生命、个体、人格的起点?畸形或疾病的严重程度、预期寿命以及相关疾病症状可能出现的时间,这些可衡量的参数能否用于做出符合伦理道德或至少可接受的决定?尽管努力追求伦理客观性,但似乎难以制定完全独立于专业经验和责任以及有时会导致辩证思维模式的法律责任的标准。母亲的需求和愿望在产科考量中将起着至关重要的作用。儿科的观点必然强调儿童的最大利益。伦理标准无法提供明确无误的答案。然而,在“两难”的情况下,它们有助于在两种“恶”之间找到一种可接受的方式:未出生胎儿的死亡或患有严重疾病的婴儿的出生。