Suppr超能文献

α-2a干扰素联合化疗作为小细胞肺癌患者的一线治疗:一项随机试验。

Interferon alpha-2a and combined chemotherapy as first line treatment in SCLC patients: a randomized trial.

作者信息

Zarogoulidis K, Ziogas E, Papagiannis A, Charitopoulos K, Dimitriadis K, Economides D, Maglaveras N, Vamvalis C

机构信息

Aristotelion University Pulmonary Department, G. Papanicolaou Hospital, Thessaloniki, Greece.

出版信息

Lung Cancer. 1996 Sep;15(2):197-205. doi: 10.1016/0169-5002(95)00583-8.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Interferons (IFNs) are known to act synergistically with antineoplastic agents when applied to SCLC cell cultures. This study was conducted in order to detect the clinical benefits, if any, of the addition of IFN-alpha in the induction chemotherapy (CT) of SCLC patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Ninety previously untreated patients with SCLC were randomly assigned to receive either CT alone (arm A) or CT plus IFN alpha-2a in a dose of 3 MU/m2 twice weekly (arm B). CT for both arms consisted of carboplatin 420 mg/m2, etoposide 200 mg/m2 and ifosfamide 3.5 g/m2 or epirubicin 80 mg/m2 every 28 days for a total of eight cycles. Responding patients received primary site and prophylactic cranial irradiation and then had maintenance CT with cyclophosphamide 100 mg/m2/day for 20 days every month. Patients in arm B received IFN throughout these treatments.

RESULTS

Eighty-one patients were evaluable for response, 39 in arm A and 42 in arm B. Both arms were comparable in terms of age, performance status and extent of disease. Overall response rates were not significantly different between the two arms (90% vs. 86%), although complete response rate was higher in arm B (38% vs. 28%). More importantly, Kaplan-Meier analysis disclosed a clear survival benefit in the arm receiving IFN-alpha (P < 0.05). For limited disease the difference was even more significant (P < 0.0067), while for extensive disease no significant difference was found (P < 0.35). Fever, fatigue and anorexia were more frequent in arm B (P < 0.001), as also leukopenia (P < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

The addition of IFN-alpha to induction CT appears to confer a survival benefit to SCLC patients but optimal dosing schedule has yet to be defined.

摘要

背景

已知干扰素(IFNs)应用于小细胞肺癌(SCLC)细胞培养时可与抗肿瘤药物协同作用。本研究旨在检测在SCLC患者诱导化疗(CT)中添加α干扰素是否有临床益处(若有)。

患者与方法

90例既往未接受过治疗的SCLC患者被随机分配,分别接受单纯CT(A组)或CT联合每周两次、剂量为3 MU/m²的α-2a干扰素(B组)。两组的CT方案均为每28天给予卡铂420 mg/m²、依托泊苷200 mg/m²和异环磷酰胺3.5 g/m²,或表柔比星80 mg/m²,共八个周期。缓解的患者接受原发部位和预防性颅脑照射,然后每月接受环磷酰胺100 mg/m²/天、持续20天的维持CT。B组患者在所有这些治疗过程中均接受干扰素治疗。

结果

81例患者可评估疗效,A组39例,B组42例。两组在年龄、体能状态和疾病范围方面具有可比性。两组的总缓解率无显著差异(90%对86%),尽管B组的完全缓解率更高(38%对28%)。更重要的是,Kaplan-Meier分析显示接受α干扰素的组有明显的生存获益(P < 0.05)。对于局限性疾病,差异更为显著(P < 0.0067),而对于广泛性疾病则未发现显著差异(P < 0.35)。B组发热、疲劳和厌食更为常见(P < 0.001),白细胞减少也是如此(P < 0.01)。

结论

在诱导CT中添加α干扰素似乎能使SCLC患者获得生存获益,但最佳给药方案尚未确定。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验