Salo T M, Viikari J S, Antila K J, Voipio-Pulkki L M, Jalonen J O, Välimäki I A
Cardiorespiratory Research Unit, University of Turku, Finland.
J Auton Nerv Syst. 1996 Aug 27;60(1-2):61-70. doi: 10.1016/0165-1838(96)00036-7.
Optimization of antihypertensive drug therapy continues to be a clinical challenge in patients with diabetes mellitus and its complications. We assessed the interference of autonomic neuropathy with drug effects on heart rate variability in 13 hypertensive diabetic subjects (mean age 48.4 years) during treatment with two blood pressure lowering drugs, metoprolol and enalapril. The baseline findings were compared with those obtained in 24 diabetic subjects without hypertension (mean age 32.5 years) and in 24 non-diabetic hypertensive patients (mean age 47.6 years). Cardiovagal autonomic neuropathy was present in 10/13 (77%) of the hypertensive diabetic group, 14/24 (58%) the non-hypertensive diabetic group and 17/24 (71%) the non-diabetic hypertensive group. Heart rate variation was studied by power spectral analysis using total variability and three different frequency bands (low-frequency 0.025-0.075 Hz, mid-frequency 0.075-0.15 Hz and high-frequency 0.15-0.40 Hz). At baseline, the two hypertensive groups showed significantly smaller mid- and high-frequency heart rate variability compared with the diabetes only group. Age and the presence of cardiovagal autonomic neuropathy were important determinants of variability. Both metoprolol and enalapril reduced blood pressure comparably in hypertensive diabetics while metoprolol also reduced heart rate. Metoprolol decreased heart rate variability at the low-frequency and mid-frequency bands even after correction for the change in heart rate. Heart rate variability was not significantly altered by enalapril. In subjects with hypertension, diabetes and autonomic neuropathy, metoprolol almost abolished all heart rate variability. Therefore, an ACE inhibitor is a more neutral treatment alternative in such patients from the point of view of autonomic cardiac control.
优化抗高血压药物治疗仍然是糖尿病及其并发症患者面临的一项临床挑战。我们评估了13例高血压糖尿病患者(平均年龄48.4岁)在使用两种降压药物美托洛尔和依那普利治疗期间,自主神经病变对药物心率变异性的影响。将基线结果与24例无高血压的糖尿病患者(平均年龄32.5岁)和24例非糖尿病高血压患者(平均年龄47.6岁)的结果进行比较。高血压糖尿病组10/13(77%)存在心血管迷走神经病变,非高血压糖尿病组14/24(58%),非糖尿病高血压组17/24(71%)。通过功率谱分析研究心率变异性,使用总变异性和三个不同频段(低频0.025 - 0.075Hz、中频0.075 - 0.15Hz和高频0.15 - 0.40Hz)。基线时,与仅患有糖尿病的组相比,两个高血压组的中频和高频心率变异性显著较小。年龄和心血管迷走神经病变的存在是变异性的重要决定因素。美托洛尔和依那普利在高血压糖尿病患者中降低血压的效果相当,而美托洛尔也降低了心率。即使校正心率变化后,美托洛尔仍降低低频和中频带的心率变异性。依那普利未显著改变心率变异性。在患有高血压、糖尿病和自主神经病变的患者中,美托洛尔几乎消除了所有心率变异性。因此,从自主心脏控制的角度来看,ACE抑制剂是这类患者更中性的治疗选择。