Mak C K, Avalos M, Randall P K, Kwan S W, Abell C W, Neumeyer J L, Whisennand R, Wilcox R E
Institute for Neuroscience, University of Texas, Austin 78712, USA.
Neuropharmacology. 1996 May;35(5):549-70. doi: 10.1016/0028-3908(96)84625-9.
Modern drug discovery demands accurate knowledge of the drug properties of affinity and efficacy at specific receptor proteins. Furthermore, drugs with well defined properties make better tools with which to explore and understand receptor regulation. The use of clonal cell lines stably expressing a given recombinant receptor may provide a highly useful model in which drug effects may be studied on one receptor subtype at a time. The present report was designed to evaluate the utility of a general method in which a clonal cell line stably expressing a recombinant D1A dopamine receptor was used as a model system for studying drug actions by null models. The null model for receptor occlusion (to calculate agonist Ka) and the null model for relative efficacy (to calculate test agonist affinity and epsilon r) were evaluated in these studies. To initiate these studies, rat C6 glioma cells that do not normally express DA receptors have been modified by stable transfection with the primate D1A DA receptor [Machida et al., 1992 (Molec. Pharmacol. 41: 652-659)] to a density of approximately equal to fmol/mg protein. The recombinant receptors show robust stimulation of cAMP in the stably transfected C6 cells. Calculation of agonist Ka from dose-response data requires that a portion of the cell's receptors be occluded in the absence of changes in post-receptor events leading to the response. Receptor reserve is typically reduced by alkylation, thereby lowering maximal response. Unfortunately, most of the currently available alkylating agents are not selective either for a particular receptor or for receptors vs other proteins within a signaling pathway. Short-term agonist treatment offers a possible complement to the use of non-selective or poorly characterized alkylating drugs for reducing maximum response in appropriate cell systems. The null method of receptor occlusion was used to determine the Ka for dopamine when maximum response was decreased by alkylation vs short-term agonist treatment. Direct non-linear curve fitting was used to analyze the data. In addition to DA, two other compounds were used to reduce receptor reserve to validate the method: fenoldopam (relatively high efficacy) and SKF38393 (low efficacy). Analyses indicated that the affinity of DA was similar whether calculated by alkylation (1.1 +/- 0.58 microM), 75 min DA treatment (0.57 +/- 0.16 microM) or 45 min treatment with DA (0.86 +/- 0.11 microM). Short-term agonist treatment experiments using multiple concentrations of DA, fenoldopam, or SKF38393 to decrease receptor reserve provided additional support for the validity of the Ka determinations using this procedure. Other experiments were conducted according to the null model for relative efficacy in which the affinity for DA is calculated by comparing the DA response before and after receptor occlusion, and the affinity and relative intrinsic efficacy of the test agonist are determined as a function of its actions relative to DA. We used the following four test drugs: + Br-APB, a novel agent with potential dopamine agonist properties, and three high-affinity DA agonists, fenoldopam, R-(-)-apomorphine (APO), and SKF38393. Intrinsic efficacy values relative to that of DA (1.0) were as follows: fenoldopam, 0.46 +/- 0.11; APO, 0.19 +/- 0.13; SKF38393, 0.07 +/- 0.01; and +Br-APB, 0.26 +/- 0.40. The agonist affinities (Ka) were: fenoldopam, 0.018 +/- 0.008 microM; APO, 0.80 +/- 0.18 microM; SKF38393, 0.16 +/- 0.04 microM; BR-APB, 0.43 +/- 0.29 microM; and DA, 0.58 +/- 0.17 microM. EC50/Ka ratios were consistent with relative intrinsic efficacies and Ka values were similar to KL values reported for membrane binding studies. Finally, Monte Carlo simulations were conducted to determine the precision of the parameter estimates...
现代药物发现需要准确了解药物在特定受体蛋白上的亲和力和效力等性质。此外,性质明确的药物能成为更好的工具,用于探索和理解受体调节。使用稳定表达特定重组受体的克隆细胞系,可能会提供一个非常有用的模型,在这个模型中可以一次研究一种受体亚型上的药物效应。本报告旨在评估一种通用方法的效用,该方法中使用稳定表达重组D1A多巴胺受体的克隆细胞系作为模型系统,通过零模型研究药物作用。在这些研究中评估了用于受体阻断的零模型(以计算激动剂Ka)和用于相对效力的零模型(以计算测试激动剂亲和力和εr)。为开展这些研究,通过用灵长类D1A多巴胺受体[町田等人,1992年(《分子药理学》41: 652 - 659)]进行稳定转染,将通常不表达多巴胺受体的大鼠C6胶质瘤细胞修饰到密度约等于fmol/mg蛋白质。重组受体在稳定转染的C6细胞中显示出对cAMP的强烈刺激。从剂量 - 反应数据计算激动剂Ka要求在不改变导致反应的受体后事件的情况下,部分细胞受体被阻断。受体储备通常通过烷基化降低,从而降低最大反应。不幸的是,目前大多数可用的烷基化剂对于特定受体或对于受体与信号通路中其他蛋白质而言都没有选择性。短期激动剂处理为在合适的细胞系统中使用非选择性或特征不佳的烷基化药物降低最大反应提供了一种可能的补充方法。当通过烷基化与短期激动剂处理降低最大反应时,使用受体阻断的零方法来确定多巴胺的Ka。使用直接非线性曲线拟合分析数据。除了多巴胺,还使用了另外两种化合物来降低受体储备以验证该方法:非诺多泮(相对高效力)和SKF38393(低效 力)。分析表明,无论通过烷基化(1.1±0.58 microM)、75分钟多巴胺处理(0.57±0.16 microM)还是45分钟多巴胺处理(0.86±0.11 microM)计算,多巴胺的亲和力相似。使用多种浓度的多巴胺、非诺多泮或SKF38393进行短期激动剂处理实验以降低受体储备,为使用该程序确定Ka的有效性提供了额外支持。根据相对效力的零模型进行了其他实验,其中通过比较受体阻断前后的多巴胺反应来计算对多巴胺的亲和力,并根据测试激动剂相对于多巴胺的作用确定其亲和力和相对内在效力。我们使用了以下四种测试药物:+Br - APB,一种具有潜在多巴胺激动剂性质的新型药物,以及三种高亲和力多巴胺激动剂,非诺多泮、R - (-) - 阿扑吗啡(APO)和SKF38393。相对于多巴胺(1.0)的内在效力值如下:非诺多泮,0.46±0.11;APO,0.19±0.13;SKF38393,0.07±0.01;和+Br - APB,0.26±0.40。激动剂亲和力(Ka)为:非诺多泮,0.018±0.008 microM;APO,0.80±0.18 microM;SKF38393,0.16±0.04 microM;BR - APB,0.43±0.29 microM;和多巴胺,0.58±0.17 microM。EC50/Ka比值与相对内在效力一致,且Ka值与膜结合研究报道的KL值相似。最后,进行了蒙特卡罗模拟以确定参数估计的精度……