• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

24小时动态血压监测期间硝苯地平两种制剂的比较。

Comparison of two formulations of nifedipine during 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring.

作者信息

Granberry M C, Gardner S F, Schneider E F, Carter I R

机构信息

Department of Pharmacy Practice, College of Pharmacy, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock 72205, USA.

出版信息

Pharmacotherapy. 1996 Sep-Oct;16(5):932-6.

PMID:8888089
Abstract

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To determine if one commercial extended-release formulation of nifedipine (Adalat CC) is as effective as another (procardia XL) in controlling blood pressure over 24 hours.

DESIGN

Open-label, randomized, crossover study.

SETTING

University-affiliated family medicine clinic.

PATIENTS

Fifteen patients with stage 1-4 primary hypertension.

INTERVENTIONS

Procardia XL or Adalat CC once/day was titrated to achieve blood pressure control. The effective dose was continued for 4 weeks, washed out for 1 week, and reinstituted with other study drug.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Twenty-four-hour ambulatory blood pressure was recorded the conclusion of each treatment phase. Treatment phases were compared for mean 24-hour blood pressure, mean daytime (6:00 A.M.-10:00 P.M.) and mean nighttime blood pressure, and mean blood pressure load (percentage of blood pressure measurements > 140/90 mm Hg daytime and > 120/80 mm Hg nighttime). Thirteen patients completed the study. No statistically significant difference was seen in mean 24-hour blood pressure (138/86 mm Hg for Procardia XL vs 137/85 mm Hg for Adalat CC), daytime or nighttime blood pressure, or blood pressure load. Two patients experienced clinically significant adverse effects while taking Adalat CC.

CONCLUSIONS

In these patients with primary hypertension, Adalat CC was as effective as Procardia XL at controlling blood pressure for 24 hours. Blood pressure, heart rate, and adverse effects should be monitored 2-4 weeks after any exchange of Adalat CC for Procardia XL.

摘要

研究目的

确定一种硝苯地平缓释制剂(拜新同控释片)在24小时内控制血压的效果是否与另一种(络活喜)相同。

设计

开放标签、随机、交叉研究。

地点

大学附属医院家庭医学诊所。

患者

15例1 - 4期原发性高血压患者。

干预措施

每日一次服用络活喜或拜新同控释片,进行滴定以实现血压控制。有效剂量持续服用4周,停药1周,然后换用另一种研究药物。

测量指标及主要结果

在每个治疗阶段结束时记录24小时动态血压。比较各治疗阶段的24小时平均血压、日间(上午6:00至晚上10:00)平均血压和夜间平均血压,以及平均血压负荷(日间血压测量值>140/90 mmHg和夜间血压测量值>120/80 mmHg的百分比)。13例患者完成了研究。在24小时平均血压(络活喜为138/86 mmHg,拜新同控释片为137/85 mmHg)、日间或夜间血压或血压负荷方面,未观察到统计学上的显著差异。2例患者在服用拜新同控释片时出现了具有临床意义的不良反应。

结论

在这些原发性高血压患者中,拜新同控释片在24小时内控制血压的效果与络活喜相同。在将拜新同控释片换为络活喜后的2 - 4周内,应监测血压、心率和不良反应。

相似文献

1
Comparison of two formulations of nifedipine during 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring.24小时动态血压监测期间硝苯地平两种制剂的比较。
Pharmacotherapy. 1996 Sep-Oct;16(5):932-6.
2
Comparative effects of felodipine ER, amlodipine and nifedipine GITS on 24 h blood pressure control and trough to peak ratios in mild to moderate ambulatory hypertension: a forced titration study.非洛地平缓释片、氨氯地平和硝苯地平控释片对轻至中度动态高血压患者24小时血压控制及谷峰比值的比较效应:一项强制滴定研究。
Can J Cardiol. 1998 May;14(5):682-8.
3
Treatment of mild-to-moderate hypertension with calcium channel blockers: a multicentre comparison of once-daily nifedipine GITS with once-daily amlodipine.钙通道阻滞剂治疗轻至中度高血压:一日一次硝苯地平控释片与一日一次氨氯地平的多中心比较
Curr Med Res Opin. 2003;19(3):226-37. doi: 10.1185/030079903125001677.
4
Prazosin GITS vs sustained release nifedipine in patients with hypertension and abnormal lipid profile: a randomized, controlled, multicenter study. Madras Hypertension Study Group.高血压合并血脂异常患者中哌唑嗪控释片与硝苯地平缓释片的比较:一项随机、对照、多中心研究。马德拉斯高血压研究组
J Assoc Physicians India. 1998;Suppl 1:30-40.
5
Prospective controlled trial of two nifedipine extended release formulations in the treatment of essential hypertension.两种硝苯地平缓释制剂治疗原发性高血压的前瞻性对照试验。
Arzneimittelforschung. 2002;52(5):379-84. doi: 10.1055/s-0031-1299901.
6
Nifedipine gastrointestinal therapeutic system versus nifedipine coat-core: comparison of efficacy via 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring.硝苯地平胃肠道治疗系统与硝苯地平包芯片:通过24小时动态血压监测比较疗效
Ann Pharmacother. 1997 Jul-Aug;31(7-8):819-22. doi: 10.1177/106002809703100701.
7
Controlled release nifedipine and valsartan combination therapy in patients with essential hypertension: the adalat CR and valsartan cost-effectiveness combination (ADVANCE-combi) study.控释硝苯地平和缬沙坦联合治疗原发性高血压患者:拜新同控释片与缬沙坦成本效益联合(ADVANCE-combi)研究
Hypertens Res. 2006 Oct;29(10):789-96. doi: 10.1291/hypres.29.789.
8
Comparison of 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure data in hypertensive patients switched from nifedipine-GITS to nifedipine-CC.从硝苯地平控释片转换为硝苯地平普通片的高血压患者24小时动态血压数据比较。
Pharmacotherapy. 1999 Jan;19(1):94-100. doi: 10.1592/phco.19.1.94.30512.
9
Antihypertensive effects of long-acting calcium channel blockers on hemodialysis days--a randomized crossover trial between benidipine and nifedipine CR.长效钙通道阻滞剂在血液透析日的降压作用——苯磺酸氨氯地平和硝苯地平控释片的随机交叉试验
Nephron Clin Pract. 2004;97(2):c49-53. doi: 10.1159/000078400.
10
A double-blind, controlled, multicenter, randomized study comparing the antihypertensive effectiveness and tolerance of a daily dose of two nifedipine formulations: nifedipine microgranules versus nifedipine osmotic pump.一项双盲、对照、多中心、随机研究,比较每日剂量的两种硝苯地平制剂(硝苯地平微粒与硝苯地平渗透泵)的降压效果和耐受性。
Am J Ther. 2007 Mar-Apr;14(2):140-6. doi: 10.1097/01.pap.0000249913.05896.3f.

引用本文的文献

1
Long-acting nifedipine in the management of essential hypertension: a review for cardiologists.长效硝苯地平在原发性高血压治疗中的应用:心血管科医生的综述
Am J Cardiovasc Dis. 2024 Dec 15;14(6):396-413. doi: 10.62347/RPMZ6407. eCollection 2024.