Smith A W, Hatcher J, Mackenzie I J, Thompson S, Bal I, Macharia I, Mugwe P, Okoth-Olende C, Oburra H, Wanjohi Z
Hearing Impairment Research Group, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, UK.
Lancet. 1996 Oct 26;348(9035):1128-33. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(96)09388-9.
The outcomes of treatment of chronic suppurative otitis media (CSOM) are disappointing and uncertain, especially in developing countries. Because CSOM is the commonest cause of hearing impairment in children in these countries, an effective method of management that can be implemented on a wide scale is needed. We report a randomised, controlled trial of treatment of CSOM among children in Kenya; unaffected schoolchildren were taught to administer the interventions.
We enrolled 524 children with CSOM, aged 5-15 years, from 145 primary schools in Kiambu district of Kenya. The schools were randomly assigned treatments in clusters of five in a ratio of two to dry mopping alone (201 children), two to dry mopping with topical and systemic antibiotics and topical steroids (221 children), and one to no specific treatment (102 children). Schools were matched on factors thought to be related to their socioeconomic status. The primary outcome measures were resolution of otorrhoea and healing of tympanic membranes on otoscopy by 8, 12, and 16 weeks after induction. Absence of perforation was confirmed by tympanometry, and hearing levels were assessed by audiometry. 29 children were withdrawn from the trial because they took non-trial antibiotics. There was no evidence of differences in timing of withdrawals between the groups.
By the 16-week follow-up visit, otorrhoea had resolved in a weighted mean proportion of 51% (95% CI 42-59) of children who received dry mopping with antibiotics, compared with 22% (14-31) of those who received dry mopping alone and 22% (9-35) of controls. Similar differences were recorded by the 8-week and 12-week visits. The weighted mean proportions of children with healing of the tympanic membranes by 16 weeks were 15% (10-21) in the dry-mopping plus antibiotics group, 13% (5-20) in the dry-mopping alone group, and 13% (3-23) in the control group. The proportion with resolution in the dry-mopping alone group did not differ significantly from that in the control group at any time. Hearing thresholds were significantly better for children with no otorrhoea at 16 weeks than for those who had otorrhoea, and were also significantly better for those whose ears had healed than for those with otorrhoea at all times.
Our finding that dry mopping plus topical and systemic antibiotics is superior to dry mopping alone contrasts with that of the only previous community-based trial in a developing country, though it accords with findings of most other trials in developed countries. The potential role of antibiotics needs further investigation. Further, similar trials are needed to identify the most cost-effective and appropriate treatment regimen for CSOM in children in developing countries.
慢性化脓性中耳炎(CSOM)的治疗效果令人失望且不确定,尤其是在发展中国家。由于CSOM是这些国家儿童听力障碍最常见的原因,因此需要一种能够广泛实施的有效管理方法。我们报告了一项在肯尼亚儿童中进行的CSOM治疗随机对照试验;让未受影响的在校儿童学习实施干预措施。
我们从肯尼亚基安布区的145所小学招募了524名5至15岁的CSOM儿童。这些学校按每五所一组进行随机分组,比例为两组采用单纯干拖法(201名儿童),两组采用干拖法加局部和全身用抗生素以及局部用类固醇(221名儿童),一组不进行特殊治疗(102名儿童)。学校根据被认为与其社会经济地位相关的因素进行匹配。主要结局指标是诱导后8周、12周和16周时耳漏的消退情况以及耳镜检查时鼓膜的愈合情况。通过鼓室导抗图确认无穿孔,并通过听力测定评估听力水平。29名儿童因服用非试验性抗生素而退出试验。各小组之间在退出时间上没有差异的证据。
到16周随访时,接受干拖法加抗生素治疗的儿童中,耳漏消退的加权平均比例为51%(95%CI 42 - 59),而单纯接受干拖法治疗的儿童为22%(14 - 31),对照组为22%(9 - 35)。在8周和12周随访时也记录到了类似差异。到16周时鼓膜愈合的儿童加权平均比例在干拖法加抗生素组为15%(10 - 21),单纯干拖法组为13%(5 - 20),对照组为13%(3 - 23)。单纯干拖法组的消退比例在任何时候与对照组相比均无显著差异。16周时无耳漏的儿童听力阈值明显优于有耳漏的儿童,并且在所有时间,耳朵已愈合的儿童听力阈值也明显优于有耳漏的儿童。
我们的研究发现,干拖法加局部和全身用抗生素优于单纯干拖法,这与之前在一个发展中国家进行的唯一一项基于社区的试验结果相反,不过与发达国家的大多数其他试验结果一致。抗生素的潜在作用需要进一步研究。此外,需要进行类似试验以确定发展中国家儿童CSOM最具成本效益和合适的治疗方案。