Feig S A, Ames M M, Sather H N, Steinherz L, Reid J M, Trigg M, Pendergrass T W, Warkentin P, Gerber M, Leonard M, Bleyer W A, Harris R E
UCLA Medical Center, USA.
Med Pediatr Oncol. 1996 Dec;27(6):505-14. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1096-911X(199612)27:6<505::AID-MPO1>3.0.CO;2-P.
The outcome of children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) and bone marrow relapse has been unsatisfactory largely because of failure to prevent subsequent leukemia relapses. Ninety-six patients were enrolled and received vincristine, prednisone, L-asparaginase, and an anthracycline as reinduction therapy. Ninety-two patients were randomized to receive either daunomycin (DNR) or idarubicin (IDR). After achievement of second complete remission (CR2), maintenance chemotherapy included the same anthracycline, IDR or DNR, high-dose cytarabine, and escalating-dose methotrexate. Compared to DNR (45 mg/m2/week x 3), IDR (12.5 mg/m2/week x 3) was associated with prolonged myelosuppression and more frequent serious infections. Halfway through the study, the dose of IDR was reduced to 10 mg/m2. Overall, second remission was achieved in 71% of patients. Reinduction rate was similar for IDR and DNR. Reasons for induction failure differed; none of 15, 1 of 5, and 5 of 7 reinduction failures were due to infection for DNR, IDR (10 mg/m2), and IDR (12.5 mg/m2), respectively. Two-year event-free survival (EFS) was better among patients who received IDR (12.5 mg/m2) (27 +/- 18%) compared to DNR (10 +/- 8%, P = 0.05) and IDR (10 mg/m2) (6 +/- 12%, P = 0.02). However, after 3 years of follow-up, late events in the high-dose IDR group result in a similar EFS to the lower-dose IDR and DNR groups. In conclusion, IDR is an effective agent in childhood ALL. When used weekly at 12.5 mg/m2 during induction, the EFS outcome during the first 2 years of treatment appears better than lower-dose IDR or DNR (45 mg/m2), although this difference was not sustained at longer periods of follow-up. Increased hematopoietic toxicity seen at this dose might be reduced through the use of supportive measures, such as hematopoietins and intestinal decontamination.
急性淋巴细胞白血病(ALL)伴骨髓复发患儿的治疗结果一直不尽人意,主要原因是未能预防后续白血病复发。96例患者入组并接受长春新碱、泼尼松、L-天冬酰胺酶和一种蒽环类药物进行再诱导治疗。92例患者被随机分配接受柔红霉素(DNR)或伊达比星(IDR)治疗。在达到第二次完全缓解(CR2)后,维持化疗包括相同的蒽环类药物(IDR或DNR)、大剂量阿糖胞苷和递增剂量的甲氨蝶呤。与DNR(45mg/m²/周×3)相比,IDR(12.5mg/m²/周×3)与骨髓抑制延长和更频繁的严重感染相关。在研究进行到一半时,IDR剂量降至10mg/m²。总体而言,71%的患者实现了第二次缓解。IDR和DNR的再诱导率相似。诱导失败的原因不同;DNR、IDR(10mg/m²)和IDR(12.5mg/m²)的15例、5例中的1例和7例中的5例再诱导失败分别不是由于感染所致。接受IDR(12.5mg/m²)治疗的患者的两年无事件生存率(EFS)优于接受DNR(10±8%,P=0.05)和IDR(10mg/m²)(6±12%,P=0.02)治疗的患者。然而,经过3年的随访,高剂量IDR组的晚期事件导致其EFS与低剂量IDR和DNR组相似。总之,IDR是儿童ALL的有效药物。在诱导期间以12.5mg/m²每周使用时,治疗前两年的EFS结果似乎优于低剂量IDR或DNR(45mg/m²),尽管在更长的随访期内这种差异并未持续。通过使用支持性措施,如造血生长因子和肠道去污,可能会降低此剂量下出现的增加的造血毒性。