Bailer A J, Ruberg S J
Department of Mathematics and Statistics, Miami University, Oxford, OH 45056, USA.
J Appl Toxicol. 1996 Sep-Oct;16(5):391-5. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1263(199609)16:5<391::AID-JAT363>3.0.CO;2-C.
Testing the equality of the area under a curve (AUC) for different dose groups is frequently done in pharmacokinetic research. Equality of AUCs is one indicator of bioequivalence. When the experimental unit must be sacrificed to obtain a response, AUC can be simply estimated using a linear combination of response means at various time points. The distribution of this estimator is simply obtained using standard statistical theory, and statistical hypothesis tests are easily constructed. These tests assume a normal distribution of responses at each time point (or at least large enough samples to assure that the mean response is normally distributed). The applicability of this test to cases of non-normal response distributions when small numbers of observations are sampled at each time point is questionable. Randomization tests are suggested for this problem. These tests provide a valuable alternative to this normal-theory test. Discussion of the assessment of dose proportionality is also presented.
在药代动力学研究中,经常会对不同剂量组的曲线下面积(AUC)是否相等进行检验。AUC相等是生物等效性的一个指标。当必须牺牲实验单位才能获得反应时,可以使用各个时间点反应均值的线性组合来简单估计AUC。该估计量的分布可通过标准统计理论轻松获得,并且易于构建统计假设检验。这些检验假设每个时间点的反应呈正态分布(或者至少有足够大的样本以确保平均反应呈正态分布)。当每个时间点抽取的观察值数量较少时,这种检验在非正态反应分布情况下的适用性值得怀疑。针对这个问题,建议采用随机化检验。这些检验为这种正态理论检验提供了有价值的替代方法。本文还讨论了剂量比例性的评估。