Walker P H, Stone P W
Frances Payne Bolton School of Nursing, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA.
J Health Care Finance. 1996 Fall;23(1):23-47.
This article presents two approaches for comparison studies of cost and quality outcomes between community-based and traditional hospital systems of care. Two methodologies are used specifically to compare midwifery practice in a free-standing birth center to traditional obstetric practice with hospital deliveries. Findings from both studies reinforce the potential cost savings of community-based care without compromising quality. The methodologies used here can be applied to other settings. These approaches are also relevant for comparison studies of cost and quality outcomes between physicians and other nonphysician providers such as physician assistants and nurse practitioners, who frequently staff emerging models of community-based care. Issues related to obtaining comparable clinical and cost data versus reimbursement for both community-based and hospital care will be highlighted.
本文介绍了两种方法,用于比较社区医疗体系和传统医院医疗体系在成本和质量结果方面的差异。具体采用两种方法,将独立分娩中心的助产实践与传统医院分娩的产科实践进行比较。两项研究的结果均表明,社区医疗在不影响质量的前提下具有潜在的成本节约优势。这里使用的方法可应用于其他场景。这些方法对于比较医生与其他非医生医疗服务提供者(如医师助理和执业护士)在成本和质量结果方面的差异也具有相关性,这些人员经常在新兴的社区医疗模式中任职。文中将重点强调与获取社区医疗和医院医疗可比的临床及成本数据以及报销相关的问题。