• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

起搏导线拔除的拉力。螺旋电极导线与翼状电极导线的比较。

Tensile force of pacing lead extraction. A comparison between tined type and screw-in type.

作者信息

Amitani S, Sohara H, Kurose M, Miyahara K, Misumi K, Sakamoto H

机构信息

Division of Cardiology, Shinkyo Hospital, Kagoshima, Japan.

出版信息

Jpn Heart J. 1996 Jul;37(4):495-501. doi: 10.1536/ihj.37.495.

DOI:10.1536/ihj.37.495
PMID:8890763
Abstract

Three months after implantation of endocardial pacing leads in 10 mongrel dogs, the tensile forces needed to remove 5 tined type and 5 screw-in type leads were compared experimentally. Mean maximum tensile force was 291 +/- 174 g with the screw-in type and 1174 +/- 369 g with the tined type (p < 0.01). Histopathologically, no changes suggesting any myocardial damage due to lead extraction were recognized in cases where screw-in type leads were used. These results support the clinical feasibility of safe and easy manual retraction of infected pacing leads of the screw-in type.

摘要

在10只杂种犬植入心内膜起搏导线3个月后,对5根翼状电极导线和5根螺旋电极导线进行了拔除所需拉力的实验比较。螺旋电极导线的平均最大拉力为291±174克,翼状电极导线为1174±369克(p<0.01)。组织病理学检查发现,使用螺旋电极导线的病例未发现因导线拔除导致心肌损伤的任何变化。这些结果支持了安全、简便手动拔除螺旋电极导线感染起搏导线的临床可行性。

相似文献

1
Tensile force of pacing lead extraction. A comparison between tined type and screw-in type.起搏导线拔除的拉力。螺旋电极导线与翼状电极导线的比较。
Jpn Heart J. 1996 Jul;37(4):495-501. doi: 10.1536/ihj.37.495.
2
[Comparison of active and passive fixation of steroid emitting atrial electrodes].[类固醇释放型心房电极主动固定与被动固定的比较]
Z Kardiol. 1996 Apr;85(4):255-9.
3
Acute changes in pacing threshold and R- or P-wave amplitude during permanent pacemaker implantation.
Am J Cardiol. 1990 Apr 15;65(15):999-1003. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(90)91003-o.
4
Atrial pacemaker leads compared.心房起搏器导线对比。
Cleve Clin J Med. 1990 Jul-Aug;57(5):433-6. doi: 10.3949/ccjm.57.5.433.
5
Thin bipolar leads: a solution to problems with coaxial bipolar designs.细双极导联:同轴双极设计问题的解决方案。
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1992 Nov;15(11 Pt 2):1986-90. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.1992.tb03007.x.
6
The nonextractable tined endocardial pacemaker lead.不可拔除的带倒刺心内膜起搏器导线。
Can J Cardiol. 1989 Sep;5(6):305-7.
7
Evolution of an active fixation atrial pacing lead.主动固定心房起搏导线的演变
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2000 Nov;23(11 Pt 2):1795-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2000.tb07021.x.
8
Difficulty of extraction of chronically implanted tined ventricular endocardial leads.长期植入的带倒刺心室心内膜导线的拔除困难。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 1984 Mar;3(3):724-31. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(84)80248-x.
9
Improved silastic sleeve temporary cardiac pacing electrodes.改良硅橡胶套管临时心脏起搏电极。
J Surg Res. 1978 Feb;24(2):113-8. doi: 10.1016/0022-4804(78)90084-7.
10
Implantation of an endocardial tined lead to prevent early dislodgment.植入心内膜带尖电极以防止早期移位。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1979 Feb;77(2):249-51.

引用本文的文献

1
[Removal of the endocardial pacemaker leads--experience with 16 leads in 10 patients].
Jpn J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1998 May;46(5):421-7. doi: 10.1007/BF03217765.