Suppr超能文献

使用血清学方法进行HLA - B27检测。酶免疫测定法与微量淋巴细胞毒试验与流式细胞术及分子生物学检测法的比较。

HLA-B27 determination using serological methods. A comparison of enzyme immunoassay and a microlymphocytotoxic test with flow cytometry and a molecular biological assay.

作者信息

Dunky A, Neumüller J, Hübner C, Fischer G F, Bayer P M, Wagner E, Schwartz D W, Mayr W R

机构信息

5th Department of Internal Medicine, Wilhelminenspital, Vienna, Austria.

出版信息

Rheumatol Int. 1996;16(3):95-100. doi: 10.1007/BF01409980.

Abstract

Typing for HLA-B27 is routinely performed in patients with seronegative spondarthritides. Besides the microlymphocytotoxic test (MLCT), other serological techniques have been developed such as enzyme immunoassays (EIA) using serum or plasma as a source for the determination of soluble HLA-B27 (sHLA-B27) and flow cytometric (FC) methods. The aim of the present study was to check the accuracy and reliability of the EIA for sHLA-B27 in comparison to the MLCT using antibodies against HLA-B27 and cross-reacting specificities (CRS), as well as an FC method and a molecular biological method. Any discrepant results should be typed with the MLCT using a complete panel of anti-HLA-class I antibodies, with FC and with a molecular biological technique. The EIA should also be repeated in those patients, using serum and plasma from a new venipuncture. In 81 patients with rheumatic disorders, the EIA and the MLCT using antibodies against HLA-B27 and CRS were performed. Based on the MLCT with a complete panel of anti-HLA-class I antibodies as a standard, discrepant test results were obtained for 9 out of 81 patients with the MLCT using antibodies against HLA-B27 and CRS and with the EIA. The following wrong results occurred: in the MLCT with anti-HLA-B27 and CRS, there were two false-negative results; in the EIA there were four false-negative and one false-positive results; one sample was undeterminable. In comparison with the MLCT, including the complete panel of HLA-class I antibodies, as well as with a molecular biological technique, typing with FC showed a complete concordance. Our investigations demonstrated that for routine typing for HLA-B27 the MLCT cannot be replaced by EIA because of a significant number of mistypings. The MLCT performed only with antibodies against HLA-B27 and CRS may also lead to typing errors. No errors were detected using flow cytometry. If only serological methods can be performed in a laboratory a combination of flow cytometry and MLCT could therefore enhance the safety of HLA-B27 typing.

摘要

对于血清阴性脊柱关节炎患者,通常会进行HLA - B27分型检测。除了微量淋巴细胞毒试验(MLCT)外,还开发了其他血清学技术,如使用血清或血浆作为来源的酶免疫测定(EIA),用于测定可溶性HLA - B27(sHLA - B27)以及流式细胞术(FC)方法。本研究的目的是通过与使用抗HLA - B27抗体和交叉反应特异性(CRS)的MLCT、FC方法以及分子生物学方法相比较,检验sHLA - B27的EIA的准确性和可靠性。任何不一致的结果都应使用一整套抗HLA - I类抗体通过MLCT、FC以及分子生物学技术进行分型。对于这些患者,还应使用新静脉穿刺采集的血清和血浆重复进行EIA检测。对81例风湿性疾病患者进行了使用抗HLA - B27和CRS抗体的EIA及MLCT检测。以使用一整套抗HLA - I类抗体的MLCT作为标准,在81例使用抗HLA - B27和CRS抗体的MLCT及EIA检测的患者中,有9例出现了不一致的检测结果。出现了以下错误结果:在使用抗HLA - B27和CRS的MLCT中,有2例假阴性结果;在EIA中有4例假阴性和1例假阳性结果;1个样本无法确定。与包括一整套HLA - I类抗体的MLCT以及分子生物学技术相比,FC分型显示完全一致。我们的研究表明,由于大量分型错误,对于HLA - B27的常规分型,MLCT不能被EIA取代。仅使用抗HLA - B27和CRS抗体进行的MLCT也可能导致分型错误。使用流式细胞术未检测到错误。因此,如果实验室只能进行血清学方法检测,流式细胞术和MLCT相结合可以提高HLA - B27分型的安全性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验