• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

与乳腺癌风险潜在相关的乳腺钼靶征象:放射科医生分类的一致性

Mammographic signs of potential relevance to breast cancer risk: the agreement of radiologists' classification.

作者信息

Jong R, Fishell E, Little L, Lockwood G, Boyd N F

机构信息

Department of Radiology, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

Eur J Cancer Prev. 1996 Aug;5(4):281-6. doi: 10.1097/00008469-199608000-00008.

DOI:10.1097/00008469-199608000-00008
PMID:8894565
Abstract

We have assessed the agreement of radiologists who quantitatively estimated the extent of various mammographic features of the breast. These features are of potential relevance to the estimation of the future risk of developing breast cancer. After preparation, in which various mammographic appearances and their classification were discussed and agreed upon, two radiologists, experienced in mammography, independently estimated the extent of various types of radiological density in 120 sets of mammograms, each comprised of two mediolateral and two craniocaudal views. The results showed a high level of agreement between the two radiologists in the classification of total mammographic densities (r = 0.89). For classification of specific types of density, agreement was best for homogeneous densities (r = 0.79), more intermediate for nodular densities (r = 0.71) and worst for linear densities (r = 0.48). These results show that radiologists can, with suitable preparation, identify total breast density, a mammographic sign relevant to a woman's risk of later developing breast cancer, with a high degree of agreement.

摘要

我们评估了对乳腺各种乳房X线特征范围进行定量估计的放射科医生之间的一致性。这些特征与未来患乳腺癌风险的估计可能相关。在进行准备工作时,讨论并商定了各种乳房X线表现及其分类,两位有乳房X线摄影经验的放射科医生独立估计了120组乳房X线照片中各种类型放射密度的范围,每组照片包括两张内外侧位和两张头尾位视图。结果显示,两位放射科医生在乳房X线总体密度分类方面具有高度一致性(r = 0.89)。对于特定类型密度的分类,均匀密度的一致性最佳(r = 0.79),结节状密度的一致性居中(r = 0.71),线状密度的一致性最差(r = 0.48)。这些结果表明,经过适当准备后,放射科医生能够高度一致地识别乳房总体密度,这是一种与女性日后患乳腺癌风险相关的乳房X线征象。

相似文献

1
Mammographic signs of potential relevance to breast cancer risk: the agreement of radiologists' classification.与乳腺癌风险潜在相关的乳腺钼靶征象:放射科医生分类的一致性
Eur J Cancer Prev. 1996 Aug;5(4):281-6. doi: 10.1097/00008469-199608000-00008.
2
Quantitative evaluation of mammographic densities: a comparison of methods of assessment.乳腺钼靶密度的定量评估:评估方法的比较
Eur J Cancer Prev. 1995 Aug;4(4):285-92. doi: 10.1097/00008469-199508000-00003.
3
Inter-reader Variability in the Use of BI-RADS Descriptors for Suspicious Findings on Diagnostic Mammography: A Multi-institution Study of 10 Academic Radiologists.乳腺影像报告和数据系统(BI-RADS)描述符在诊断性乳腺钼靶检查中对可疑发现的使用的阅片者间差异:一项针对10名学术放射科医生的多机构研究
Acad Radiol. 2017 Jan;24(1):60-66. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2016.09.010. Epub 2016 Oct 25.
4
Mammographic density and cancer detection: does digital imaging challenge our current understanding?乳腺钼靶密度与癌症检测:数字成像是否对我们目前的认知提出了挑战?
Acad Radiol. 2014 Nov;21(11):1377-85. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2014.06.004. Epub 2014 Aug 2.
5
Observer variation in the classification of mammographic parenchymal patterns.乳腺钼靶实质模式分类中的观察者差异。
J Chronic Dis. 1986;39(6):465-72. doi: 10.1016/0021-9681(86)90113-x.
6
Mammographic Breast Density Assessment Using Automated Volumetric Software and Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BIRADS) Categorization by Expert Radiologists.使用自动容积软件进行乳腺钼靶密度评估以及由专业放射科医生进行乳腺影像报告和数据系统(BIRADS)分类
Acad Radiol. 2016 Jan;23(1):70-7. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2015.09.011. Epub 2015 Oct 26.
7
Classification of fatty and dense breast parenchyma: comparison of automatic volumetric density measurement and radiologists' classification and their inter-observer variation.脂肪型和致密型乳腺实质的分类:自动容积密度测量与放射科医生分类的比较及其观察者间差异
Acta Radiol. 2016 Oct;57(10):1178-85. doi: 10.1177/0284185115626469. Epub 2016 Jan 20.
8
Quantitative classification of mammographic densities and breast cancer risk: results from the Canadian National Breast Screening Study.乳腺钼靶密度的定量分类与乳腺癌风险:加拿大全国乳腺筛查研究的结果
J Natl Cancer Inst. 1995 May 3;87(9):670-5. doi: 10.1093/jnci/87.9.670.
9
The inter-observer variability of breast density scoring between mammography technologists and breast radiologists and its effect on the rate of adjuvant ultrasound.乳腺钼靶技师与乳腺放射科医生之间乳腺密度评分的观察者间变异性及其对辅助超声检查率的影响。
Eur J Radiol. 2016 May;85(5):957-62. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2016.02.023. Epub 2016 Mar 3.
10
How mammographic breast density affects radiologists' visual search patterns.乳腺钼靶密度如何影响放射科医生的视觉搜索模式。
Acad Radiol. 2014 Nov;21(11):1386-93. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2014.06.013. Epub 2014 Aug 27.

引用本文的文献

1
Determinants of the reliability of ultrasound tomography sound speed estimates as a surrogate for volumetric breast density.超声断层扫描声速估计作为乳腺体积密度替代指标的可靠性决定因素。
Med Phys. 2015 Oct;42(10):5671-8. doi: 10.1118/1.4929985.
2
Reproducibility of BI-RADS breast density measures among community radiologists: a prospective cohort study.社区放射科医生间 BI-RADS 乳腺密度测量的可重复性:一项前瞻性队列研究。
Breast J. 2012 Jul-Aug;18(4):326-33. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4741.2012.01250.x. Epub 2012 May 21.
3
Evaluation of mammographic density patterns: reproducibility and concordance among scales.
乳腺密度模式评估:不同评估方法间的可重复性和一致性。
BMC Cancer. 2010 Sep 13;10:485. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-10-485.
4
Breast tissue composition and susceptibility to breast cancer.乳房组织成分与乳腺癌易感性。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2010 Aug 18;102(16):1224-37. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djq239. Epub 2010 Jul 8.
5
Mammographic density.乳腺钼靶密度
Breast Cancer Res. 2009;11 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):S4. doi: 10.1186/bcr2423. Epub 2009 Dec 18.