• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

确定抗高血压药物谷峰比的建议指南。

Suggested guidelines for determining the trough-to-peak ratio of antihypertensive drugs.

作者信息

Myers M G

机构信息

Division of Cardiology, Sunnybrook Health Science Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

Am J Hypertens. 1996 Oct;9(10 Pt 2):76S-82S; discussion 87S-90S. doi: 10.1016/0895-7061(96)00267-1.

DOI:10.1016/0895-7061(96)00267-1
PMID:8896668
Abstract

The trough-to-peak (T:P) ratio is a measure of a drug's antihypertensive effects over a standard dosing interval. The T:P ratio was introduced by regulatory authorities without any details on how it was to be derived from clinical trial data. Differences in study design (sequential versus cross-over), techniques for recording blood pressure, methods of correcting for placebo responses, timing and duration of peak and trough effects, activity status of patients, use of responders only versus all subjects, and duration of antihypertensive therapy have made it difficult to interpret the clinical relevance of much of the existing data on the T:P ratio. Minimum standards for obtaining the T:P ratio over a 24 h dosing interval are proposed for use in future studies in order to obtain more precise and reproducible T:P ratios and to compare differences between compounds with greater reliability.

摘要

谷峰(T:P)比值是衡量药物在标准给药间隔内降压效果的指标。监管机构引入了T:P比值,但未详细说明如何从临床试验数据中得出该比值。研究设计(序贯试验与交叉试验)、血压记录技术、安慰剂反应校正方法、峰效应和谷效应的时间及持续时间、患者的活动状态、仅使用反应者与所有受试者、以及降压治疗持续时间等方面的差异,使得很难解读现有许多关于T:P比值的数据的临床相关性。建议采用在24小时给药间隔内获取T:P比值的最低标准,用于未来研究,以便获得更精确和可重复的T:P比值,并更可靠地比较不同化合物之间的差异。

相似文献

1
Suggested guidelines for determining the trough-to-peak ratio of antihypertensive drugs.确定抗高血压药物谷峰比的建议指南。
Am J Hypertens. 1996 Oct;9(10 Pt 2):76S-82S; discussion 87S-90S. doi: 10.1016/0895-7061(96)00267-1.
2
Trough-to-peak versus surface ratio in the assessment of antihypertensive agents. APTH Investigators. Ambulatory Blood Pressure and Treatment of Hypertension.
Blood Press. 1995 Nov;4(6):350-7. doi: 10.3109/08037059509077620.
3
Practical relevance of the 24-hour trough: peak ratio of antihypertensive drugs.抗高血压药物24小时谷值:峰值比的实际意义。
J Hypertens Suppl. 1995 Aug;13(2):S109-12. doi: 10.1097/00004872-199508001-00018.
4
Use of trough:peak ratio in the assessment of antihypertensive drug therapy.谷峰比值在抗高血压药物治疗评估中的应用。
Can J Cardiol. 1994 Nov;10 Suppl D:17D-20D.
5
Antihypertensive treatment and trough: peak ratio: general considerations.
J Hypertens Suppl. 1994 Nov;12(8):S79-82; discussion S83.
6
Evaluation of once-daily antihypertensive therapy.
Heart Dis. 2000 Mar-Apr;2(2):S7-12.
7
Concentration-effect relationships and implications for trough-to-peak ratio.浓度-效应关系及其对谷峰比的影响
Am J Hypertens. 1996 Oct;9(10 Pt 2):66S-70S; discussion 87S-90S. doi: 10.1016/0895-7061(96)00266-x.
8
Role of trough to peak efficacy in the evaluation of antihypertensive therapy.
J Hypertens Suppl. 1998 Jan;16(1):S59-64.
9
Methodology to determine duration of action for antihypertensive drugs.
Ann Pharmacother. 2002 May;36(5):874-81. doi: 10.1345/aph.10367.
10
New FDA guidelines on the treatment of hypertension: comparison of different therapeutic classes according to trough/peak blood pressure responses.
Arch Mal Coeur Vaiss. 1994 Nov;87(11):1423-9.

引用本文的文献

1
Blood Pressure Variability (BPV): What Clinicians Need to Know a 2025 Expert Consensus Report Endorsed by the Egyptian Society of Cardiology.血压变异性(BPV):临床医生需要了解的内容——2025年专家共识报告(由埃及心脏病学会认可)
High Blood Press Cardiovasc Prev. 2025 Sep 10. doi: 10.1007/s40292-025-00737-6.
2
Current status of sustained release formulations in the treatment of hypertension. An overview.缓释制剂在高血压治疗中的现状。综述。
Clin Pharmacokinet. 1999;37 Suppl 1:1-6. doi: 10.2165/00003088-199937001-00001.