Suppr超能文献

夜间遗尿症的治疗:为什么去氨加压素效果不佳?

Cure of nocturnal enuresis: why isn't desmopressin very effective?

作者信息

Koff S A

机构信息

Section of Pediatric Urology, Children's Hospital, Columbus, OH 43205-2696, USA.

出版信息

Pediatr Nephrol. 1996 Oct;10(5):667-70. doi: 10.1007/s004670050186.

Abstract

Prospective controlled studies on the treatment of enuresis with desmopressin (DDAVP) indicate that cure rates (complete dryness) while on therapy are markedly lower than are response rates (decrease in wet nights). In an attempt to explain this discrepancy, we analyzed the etiological mechanisms for enuresis and found evidence that most children are not cured by DDAVP because their nocturnal wetting is not actually caused by the defect which DDAVP therapy aims to cure: low nocturnal vasopressin secretion with high nocturnal urinary output. Our study suggested that an arrest in the normal development of two separate areas of the central nervous system is necessary for enuresis to occur in many patients, yet cure of enuresis occurs if either developmental delay is eliminated. This hypothesis of a dual developmental delay helps to unify many diverse and often seemingly contradictory scientific observations about this condition and to explain why many patients react inconsistently to treatment aimed at a single etiology, yet eventually become dry.

摘要

关于去氨加压素(DDAVP)治疗遗尿症的前瞻性对照研究表明,治疗期间的治愈率(完全干爽)明显低于有效率(尿床夜数减少)。为了解释这种差异,我们分析了遗尿症的病因机制,发现证据表明大多数儿童未被DDAVP治愈,因为他们夜间尿床实际上并非由DDAVP疗法旨在治愈的缺陷引起:夜间抗利尿激素分泌低且夜间尿量高。我们的研究表明,中枢神经系统两个不同区域的正常发育停滞是许多患者发生遗尿症的必要条件,但如果消除任何一个发育延迟,遗尿症即可治愈。这种双重发育延迟的假设有助于统一许多关于这种病症的多样且往往看似矛盾的科学观察结果,并解释为什么许多患者对针对单一病因的治疗反应不一致,但最终会不再尿床。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验