Landes D P, Clayton-Smith A J
Department of Dental Public Health, Leeds Health Authority, UK.
Community Dent Health. 1996 Sep;13(3):169-71.
The first aim of this study was first to investigate the effectiveness of seeing patients at a separate appointment prior to any subsequent appointment for the administration of an anaesthetic, for patients referred from general dental practitioners to the Community Dental Service for dental extractions under general anaesthesia. The second aim was to assess the technical adequacy of the information contained in the referrals from general practitioners for the safe provision of extractions under general anaesthesia. The purposes of the assessments were to reduce the number of patients receiving a general anaesthetic, to ensure that the anaesthetist had a satisfactory medical history for the safe administration of an anaesthetic and that the dental officer undertaking the extractions had satisfactory clinical information to undertake the proposed dental care. A sample of records of patients seen at assessment appointments was drawn from a twelve month period. Five hundred and ninety-three patients records were used. One hundred and five cases required further investigations before an anaesthetic could be given. In 264 cases extractions were undertaken as requested by their own dentist, 208 patients had their treatment plans altered, 49 cases had extractions performed with local anaesthesia and 41 cases were discharged without any treatment. The pre-general anaesthetic assessment appointments prevented the need for a general anaesthetic for 15 per cent of referrals from general dental practitioners.
本研究的首要目的是,对于从普通牙科医生转诊至社区牙科服务机构以接受全身麻醉下拔牙治疗的患者,首先调查在后续进行任何麻醉给药预约之前单独安排一次预约看诊的有效性。第二个目的是评估普通医生转诊信息中所含内容对于安全实施全身麻醉下拔牙的技术充分性。这些评估的目的是减少接受全身麻醉的患者数量,确保麻醉医生掌握用于安全实施麻醉的满意病史,并且确保进行拔牙的牙科医生掌握用于开展拟议牙科治疗的满意临床信息。从十二个月期间看过诊的患者记录中抽取了一个样本。使用了593份患者记录。105例患者在能够给予麻醉之前需要进一步检查。在264例中,按其自己牙医的要求进行了拔牙,208例患者的治疗计划被更改,49例患者接受了局部麻醉下的拔牙,41例患者未接受任何治疗即出院。全身麻醉前评估预约使得15%来自普通牙科医生的转诊患者无需接受全身麻醉。