Barrett J S, Szego P, Rohatagi S, Morales R J, De Witt K E, Rajewski G, Ireland J
Pharmacokinetics Department, Somerset Pharmaceuticals, Tampa, Florida 33607, USA.
Pharm Res. 1996 Oct;13(10):1535-40. doi: 10.1023/a:1016035730754.
The absorption and disposition of selegiline (SEL) and its metabolites N-desmethylselegiline (DMS), L-methamphetamine (MET), and L-amphetamine (AMP) were assessed in 8 healthy male volunteers at proximal and distal regions of the intestine relative to oral administration (in the stomach) to determine if intestinal site dependence contributed to the erratic oral absorption of selegiline hydrochloride which is manifest as low and variable bioavailability.
An open-label, four-way crossover, single dose pharmacokinetic study comparing the bioavailability of 10 mg selegiline hydrochloride administered to healthy young males as a solution by the oral route (in the stomach) and by a nasoenteric tube to the following three sites: duodenum, jejunum and terminal ileum was conducted. Infusions were administered over a 1 minute interval and a two week washout was observed between treatments. Samples were taken over 96 hours and analyzed by LC/MS/MS.
Selegiline exposure was greatest following administration to the stomach (approximately 150% > duodenum or jejunum) and least in the terminal ileum (approximately 33% less than duodenum or jejunum). Duodenal and jejunal sites were equivocal based on selegiline absorption and subsequent metabolism. While both AMP and MET exposure was equivalent at all dosing sites, DMS exposure was less (approximately 18%) at the terminal ileum.
The oral absorption of selegiline is neither permeability-limited or intestinal site-dependent. Stomach absorption may bypass presystemic metabolism. The reduced DMS exposure at the terminal ileum is consistent with the theorized presystemic formation of DMS via luminal P450 enzymes and the density of these enzymes in the duodenum and jejunum relative to the ileum. AMP and MET metabolites were insensitive to dosing site consistent with their hepatic formation. The true magnitude of these effects would require multiple dosing as single dose pharmacokinetics do not predict the extent of multiple dose selegiline exposure.
在8名健康男性志愿者中,评估司来吉兰(SEL)及其代谢产物N-去甲基司来吉兰(DMS)、L-甲基苯丙胺(MET)和L-苯丙胺(AMP)在肠道近端和远端相对于口服给药(在胃中)的吸收和处置情况,以确定肠道部位依赖性是否导致盐酸司来吉兰口服吸收不稳定,表现为生物利用度低且变化大。
进行了一项开放标签、四交叉、单剂量药代动力学研究,比较10mg盐酸司来吉兰以溶液形式经口服途径(在胃中)和通过鼻肠管给药至以下三个部位:十二指肠、空肠和回肠末端时的生物利用度。输注在1分钟内进行,各治疗之间观察到两周的洗脱期。在96小时内采集样本并通过液相色谱/串联质谱法进行分析。
司来吉兰在胃给药后的暴露量最大(比十二指肠或空肠高约150%),在回肠末端最小(比十二指肠或空肠低约33%)。基于司来吉兰的吸收和后续代谢,十二指肠和空肠部位的情况不明确。虽然在所有给药部位AMP和MET的暴露量相当,但DMS在回肠末端的暴露量较低(约低18%)。
司来吉兰的口服吸收既不受通透性限制,也不依赖于肠道部位。胃吸收可能绕过首过代谢。回肠末端DMS暴露量降低与通过肠腔P450酶理论上的DMS首过形成以及这些酶在十二指肠和空肠相对于回肠的密度一致。AMP和MET代谢产物对给药部位不敏感,这与其在肝脏中的形成一致。这些效应的真实程度需要多次给药来确定,因为单剂量药代动力学无法预测多次剂量司来吉兰的暴露程度。