Hester L E, White M J
Clin Nurse Spec. 1996 Jul;10(4):190-3. doi: 10.1097/00002800-199607000-00011.
With the evolution of the clinical nurse specialist (CNS) and nurse practitioner (NP) roles and with the changes in the healthcare delivery system, recent debate in advanced practice nursing has centered on blending or merging the roles to meet future healthcare needs. To determine the views of CNSs, the University of Texas at Houston Health Science Center School of Nursing conducted a survey of 80 nurses (all active graduate program preceptors) functioning in the CNS role in the Houston area. Respondents were asked whether they felt the role should be deleted or merged, their ideas for the future of the role, and how education could better prepare the CNS student. Forty-two questionnaires were returned (53% return). Twenty-nine (71%) respondents did not want the role deleted, seven (17%) favored deletion of the CNS role, five (12%) favored blending the CNS and NP roles, and one (0.02%) suggested the title of acute care nurse practitioner. Although the survey's results did not show overwhelming support for either deletion or merging of the CNS role, valuable information was gathered from the responses. The CNS community identified recommendations that will help shape our focus for practice and guide us in educational design in curriculum revision.
随着临床护理专家(CNS)和执业护士(NP)角色的演变以及医疗服务体系的变化,近期高级实践护理领域的争论集中在融合或合并这些角色以满足未来医疗需求。为了确定临床护理专家的观点,德克萨斯大学休斯顿健康科学中心护理学院对休斯顿地区80名担任临床护理专家角色的护士(均为在职研究生项目指导教师)进行了一项调查。受访者被问及他们是否认为该角色应被删除或合并、对该角色未来的想法以及教育如何能更好地培养临床护理专家学生。共收回42份问卷(回收率53%)。29名(71%)受访者不希望该角色被删除,7名(17%)赞成删除临床护理专家角色,5名(12%)赞成融合临床护理专家和执业护士角色,1名(0.02%)建议采用急性护理执业护士这一称谓。尽管调查结果并未显示出对删除或合并临床护理专家角色的压倒性支持,但从回复中收集到了有价值的信息。临床护理专家群体提出了一些建议,这些建议将有助于确定我们的实践重点,并在课程修订的教学设计中为我们提供指导。